BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 8, 2026; 7(2): 121644
Published online Sep 8, 2026. doi: 10.37126/aige.121644
Table 1 Technical process and typical use of common artificial intelligence architectures used in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
AI architecture
Technical process
Primary logic
Thinking style
Typical use
CNNCV and DLSpatial. Image analysisWhat is the object?Sees pixels and identify shapes-organ/tool detection/segmentation
Transformer DL and video analyticsTemporal dependency. Sequence. Video analysisWhat happens next?Looks at the sequence of events over time-video analysis, workflow assessment and phase recognition
GNNDL and Topological AIRelational/topologicalHow are these connected?Goes beyond seeing pixels to structure-CVS and anatomy mapping
FoundationalGeneralist AI/MLLMsKnowledgeI have seen this beforeGeneralizable feature extraction and cross-procedural understanding
Table 2 Detection rate of cystic duct and common bile duct across Nassar grades in low dose indocyanine green near infrared vs artificial intelligence integrated indocyanine green near infrared modes (the two studies are independent non comparative studies)
Anatomical structure
ICG NIR FC[52]
AI enabled ICG NIR FC[51]
Pre-dissection detection percentage
Post-dissection detection percentage
Video enabled detection percentage (sensitivity)
Nassar grade 1CBD 39, CD 0CBD 100, CD 70CBD 100, CD 94.12
Nassar grade 2CBD 98.61, CD 87.50
Nassar grade 3 CBD 0, CD 0CBD 100, CD 73CBD 100, CD 92.50
Nassar grade 4CBD 98.25, CD 60.61
Table 3 Utility and limitations of various imaging aids, endo vision systems and artificial intelligence in detection of biliary anatomy and pathology in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Mode
CBD detection rates
Benefits
Limitations
WLI49.7%[17]No additional training or equipment is neededLow sensitivity in difficult grades
IOC87% to 95%[10]Good for biliary anatomy particularly aberrant ducts. Good visualization of entire biliary tree. Detection of simultaneous CBD stones. Simultaneous intervention possible for stonesLearning curve, need for CD cannulation, radiation exposure, visualization is not real time, not for vascular anatomy delineation, false positives, routine use advocated can increase time and cost, not repeatable
IOU92%-100%[13]Good for biliary anatomy particularly aberrant ducts. Detection of simultaneous CBD stones. Good for vascular anatomy delineation. No CD cannulation needed. No risk of radiation or dye allergies. Can be repeated easilySteep learning curve. Operator dependent. Difficulty visualizing distal CBD. Inflammatory interference. Limited “Map” of injury
ICG NIR96% vs 78%-86% in easy vs difficult cases[14,25,26]Short learning curve, no radiation exposure, real time visualization, no CD cannulation, intraoperative navigation of safe dissection zonesDye spillage from bile leak/GB perforation can impede visualization. Non-visualization-blocked CD/stones. Hepatic fluorescence interference. Penetration limited in fat/inflammation. Not useful for CBD stones. Small chance of dye allergy
YE and other spectral modesNo concrete data available presumed to be same as WLIImproved vascular anatomy detection particularly cystic artery. Detection of cystic plate. Rouviere’s sulcus and other surface topographyRole still evolving, limited evidence only few case reports
AI in WLI71% anatomy detection 92% CVS detection 92% accuracy for safe zones[44,46,47]Moderate sensitivity for anatomy detection. High sensitivity for CVS detectionNeeds validation in further studies. Requires AI enabled endo vision systems for real time mapping
AI and ICG integration94.39% with YOLO. 82%-100% depending on difficulty grades[51]High sensitivity in difficult grades. May be helpful for real time definition of safe dissection zonesNeeds validation in further studies. Requires AI enabled endo vision systems for real time mapping


Write to the Help Desk