Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 8, 2026; 7(2): 121644
Published online Sep 8, 2026. doi: 10.37126/aige.121644
Published online Sep 8, 2026. doi: 10.37126/aige.121644
Table 1 Technical process and typical use of common artificial intelligence architectures used in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
| AI architecture | Technical process | Primary logic | Thinking style | Typical use |
| CNN | CV and DL | Spatial. Image analysis | What is the object? | Sees pixels and identify shapes-organ/tool detection/segmentation |
| Transformer | DL and video analytics | Temporal dependency. Sequence. Video analysis | What happens next? | Looks at the sequence of events over time-video analysis, workflow assessment and phase recognition |
| GNN | DL and Topological AI | Relational/topological | How are these connected? | Goes beyond seeing pixels to structure-CVS and anatomy mapping |
| Foundational | Generalist AI/MLLMs | Knowledge | I have seen this before | Generalizable feature extraction and cross-procedural understanding |
Table 2 Detection rate of cystic duct and common bile duct across Nassar grades in low dose indocyanine green near infrared vs artificial intelligence integrated indocyanine green near infrared modes (the two studies are independent non comparative studies)
| Anatomical structure | ICG NIR FC[52] | AI enabled ICG NIR FC[51] | |
| Pre-dissection detection percentage | Post-dissection detection percentage | Video enabled detection percentage (sensitivity) | |
| Nassar grade 1 | CBD 39, CD 0 | CBD 100, CD 70 | CBD 100, CD 94.12 |
| Nassar grade 2 | CBD 98.61, CD 87.50 | ||
| Nassar grade 3 | CBD 0, CD 0 | CBD 100, CD 73 | CBD 100, CD 92.50 |
| Nassar grade 4 | CBD 98.25, CD 60.61 | ||
Table 3 Utility and limitations of various imaging aids, endo vision systems and artificial intelligence in detection of biliary anatomy and pathology in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
| Mode | CBD detection rates | Benefits | Limitations |
| WLI | 49.7%[17] | No additional training or equipment is needed | Low sensitivity in difficult grades |
| IOC | 87% to 95%[10] | Good for biliary anatomy particularly aberrant ducts. Good visualization of entire biliary tree. Detection of simultaneous CBD stones. Simultaneous intervention possible for stones | Learning curve, need for CD cannulation, radiation exposure, visualization is not real time, not for vascular anatomy delineation, false positives, routine use advocated can increase time and cost, not repeatable |
| IOU | 92%-100%[13] | Good for biliary anatomy particularly aberrant ducts. Detection of simultaneous CBD stones. Good for vascular anatomy delineation. No CD cannulation needed. No risk of radiation or dye allergies. Can be repeated easily | Steep learning curve. Operator dependent. Difficulty visualizing distal CBD. Inflammatory interference. Limited “Map” of injury |
| ICG NIR | 96% vs 78%-86% in easy vs difficult cases[14,25,26] | Short learning curve, no radiation exposure, real time visualization, no CD cannulation, intraoperative navigation of safe dissection zones | Dye spillage from bile leak/GB perforation can impede visualization. Non-visualization-blocked CD/stones. Hepatic fluorescence interference. Penetration limited in fat/inflammation. Not useful for CBD stones. Small chance of dye allergy |
| YE and other spectral modes | No concrete data available presumed to be same as WLI | Improved vascular anatomy detection particularly cystic artery. Detection of cystic plate. Rouviere’s sulcus and other surface topography | Role still evolving, limited evidence only few case reports |
| AI in WLI | 71% anatomy detection 92% CVS detection 92% accuracy for safe zones[44,46,47] | Moderate sensitivity for anatomy detection. High sensitivity for CVS detection | Needs validation in further studies. Requires AI enabled endo vision systems for real time mapping |
| AI and ICG integration | 94.39% with YOLO. 82%-100% depending on difficulty grades[51] | High sensitivity in difficult grades. May be helpful for real time definition of safe dissection zones | Needs validation in further studies. Requires AI enabled endo vision systems for real time mapping |
- Citation: Hazrah P, Rautela VS, Sharma V, Mittal S, Madan RR, Sharma D. Improving precision of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A review on the role of newer intraoperative imaging aids and artificial intelligence. Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 7(2): 121644
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2689-7164/full/v7/i2/121644.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.37126/aige.121644