BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Meta-Anal. Sep 18, 2026; 14(3): 124719
Published online Sep 18, 2026. doi: 10.13105/wjma.124719
Table 1 Characteristics of the included randomized trials
Ref.
Setting
EUS/ERCP
Population
Ultrasound-guided route
Stents
Follow-up
Bang et al[9], 2018United States33/34Pancreatic cancerCholedochoduodenostomyTubular covered metal/covered metalAt least 6 months
Park et al[10], 2018South Korea14/14 analyzedPredominantly pancreatic cancerTransmural drainagePartially covered tubular metal/metalMedian 95/147 days
Paik et al[8], 2018South Korea; multicenter64/61Unresectable distal obstructionCholedochoduodenostomy or hepaticogastrostomyTubular covered metal/covered metalTo death or dysfunction
Chen et al[11], 2023Canada/France; multicenter73/71Borderline, locally advanced, or unresectableCholedochoduodenostomyLumen-apposing metal/metal1 year
Teoh et al[12], 2023International; multicenter79/76Unresectable distal obstructionCholedochoduodenostomyLumen-apposing metal/covered metal1 year
Anderloni et al[13], 2026Italy; multicenter111/109Distal obstruction; common bile duct at least 15 mmCholedochoduodenostomyLumen-apposing metal/covered metal6 months
Table 2 Summary of pooled outcomes
Outcome
EUS-guided
ERCP
RR (95%CI)
I2
Interpretation
Technical success350/374304/3651.08 (0.96-1.22)64No clear difference; inconsistent
Clinical success331/369322/3591.01 (0.95-1.07)0Comparable
Procedure-related adverse events52/37463/3650.83 (0.53-1.31)1Imprecise
Postprocedural pancreatitis2/37424/3650.20 (0.05-0.77)0Lower with ultrasound-guided drainage
Stent dysfunction or reintervention35/37456/3650.60 (0.36-1.01)0Possible reduction; uncertain


Write to the Help Desk