Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 28, 2021; 9(4): 377-388
Published online Aug 28, 2021. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v9.i4.377
Figure 1
Figure 1  Flowchart of study selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2  Risk of bias summary of randomized controlled trials.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Change in visual analogue scale scores and supportive analgesic medication. A: Forest plot showing dienogest vs other intervention (GnRH-a and placebo) in the outcomes of changes in endometriosis related pain measured on visual analogue scale; B: Forest plot showing dienogest vs placebo in the outcome of supportive analgesic medication intake changes at the end of treatment. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Changes in bone mineral density and serum estradiol. A: Forest plot showing dienogest vs other intervention (GnRH-a and placebo) in the outcomes of percent change in bone mineral density; B: Forest plot showing dienogest vs placebo in the change of serum estradiol at the end of treatment. CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Incidence of headache and hot flushes. A: Forest plot showing dienogest vs other intervention (GnRH-a and placebo) in the incidence of headache; B: Forest plot showing dienogest vs other intervention (GnRH-a and placebo) in the incidence of hot flushes.