Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Meta-Anal. Feb 26, 2017; 5(1): 1-13
Published online Feb 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i1.1
Figure 1
Figure 1 PRISMA 2009 flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Mortality rate. No statistically significant difference was found between the colic stenting and emergency surgery groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Morbidity rate. No statistically significant difference was found between the colon stenting and emergency surgery groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Permanent stoma rate. No significant difference was found between the colon stenting and emergency surgery groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Primary anastomosis rate. Tthis parameter is higher in the colonic stenting group, with a significant difference in comparison with the emergency surgery group.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Stoma creation rate. Tthis parameter is higher in the emergency surgery group, with a significant difference between the two groups considered.
Figure 7
Figure 7 One-year recurrence rate. This parameter is higher in the colonic stenting in comparison with the emergency surgery group, with a significant difference between the two groups.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Disease-free survival rate. No significant difference was found between the colonic stenting and emergency surgery groups.
Figure 9
Figure 9 Overall survival rate. No significant difference was found between the colonic stenting and emergency surgery groups.