Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 26, 2014; 2(3): 78-90
Published online Aug 26, 2014. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v2.i3.78
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow diagram for identification of eligible trials evaluating the effect of ultrasound vs sham on pain and physical function.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Funnel plot illustrating the statistical precision plotted as a function of the standardized mean difference for the effect of therapeutic ultrasound on patient-reported knee pain. Statistical inferences are not possible when fewer than 10 trials are available; therefore the pseudo 95% confidence limits around the summary treatment effect are not shown. SMD: Standardized mean difference.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Forest plot. A: For meta-analysis of the effect of ultrasound (US) compared to sham on pain; B: For trials reporting the pain outcome subgrouped according to US dose; C: For meta-analysis of the effect of US compared to sham treatment on self-reported physical function; D: For meta-analysis of the effect of US compared to sham treatment on walking performance; E: For trials reporting a walking performance outcome subgrouped according to US dose.