BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Exp Med. Sep 20, 2026; 16(3): 125753
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5493/wjem.125753
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who underwent apheresis for planned chimeric antigen receptor T-cell infusion, n (%)
Characteristic
CAR-T infused (n = 87)
Not infused (n = 12)
P value
Test
Age at apheresis, year, median (range)67.7 (36.7-81.7)70.2 (42.6-83.7)0.415Wilcoxon
SexNot evaluable (missing 87/87)Not evaluable (missing 12/12)--
Plasma cell leukaemia3/87 (3.4)3/12 (25.0)0.017Fisher
Extramedullary disease17/87 (19.5)9/12 (75.0)< 0.001Fisher
High-risk cytogenetics129/85 (34.1)4/11 (36.4)0.88Fisher
Missing21--
R-ISS stage--0.19Fisher
I11/66 (16.7)1/11 (9.1)--
II52/66 (78.8)8/11 (72.7)--
III3/66 (4.5)2/11 (18.2)--
Not evaluable211--
Prior lines of therapy, median (range)5 (2-19)5 (4-8)0.431Wilcoxon
Prior autologous or allogeneic transplant81/87 (93.1)10/12 (83.3)0.24Fisher
Bridging therapy after apheresis33/87 (37.9)5/12 (41.7)0.80Fisher
Apheresis-to-infusion interval, days, median (IQR; range)54 (46-62; 37-202), n = 842Not applicable--
Lymphodepleting regimen
Fludarabine/cyclophosphamide43/87 (49.4)---
Bendamustine44/87 (50.6)---
Intended/administered CAR-T product--0.55Fisher
Ciltacabtagene autoleucel45/87 (51.7)6/12 (50.0)--
Idecabtagene vicleucel42/87 (48.3)6/12 (50.0)--
Table 2 Patient-level characteristics and outcomes of the 12 patients who underwent apheresis but were not infused
ID
Age band (year)
EMD
PCL
High-risk cyto
R-ISS
Prior lines
Intended product
Bridging regimen (category)
Days apheresis → attrition event
Reason not infused
Subsequent therapy
Outcome (months from apheresis)
N-0160-64YesNoNoII7Ide-celNone176Infection (bacteraemia, prolonged admission)NoneDied, 5.8
N-0280-84NoNoNoII4Ide-celNone11Non-myeloma death (COVID-19, pulmonary embolism)NoneDied, 1.0
N-0375-79YesNoNoI6Ide-celAntibody-drug conjugate70Non-myeloma death (ischaemic stroke)NoneDied, 2.3
N-0460-64YesYesYesII4Cilta-celPI + BCL2 inhibitor + steroid34Manufacturing failure (out-of-specification product)BCMA bispecificDied, 6.2
N-0555-59YesNoNoII5Cilta-celNone24Progressive disease + intracranial haemorrhageNoneDied, 0.8
N-0675-79YesNoYesII4Ide-celRadiotherapy71Progressive disease → bowel ischaemiaNoneDied, 2.3
N-0740-44NoYesYesIII5Cilta-celNone51Progressive disease; declined further therapyNoneLost to follow-up; censored 1.7
N-0880-84YesNoNoII5Cilta-celAlkylator + PI + steroid47Progressive diseaseNoneDied, 1.5
N-0965-69YesNoYesII5Ide-celBCMA bispecific33Progressive diseaseNoneDied, 1.1
N-1060-64YesYesNoIII8Cilta-celNone5Progressive diseaseNoneDied, 0.2
N-1180-84YesNoUnknownUnknown7Ide-celNone196Collection failure (inadequate CD3+ yield)GPRC5D bispecificAlive, 11.7
N-1270-74NoNoNoII5Cilta-celNone42Progressive diseaseNoneDied, 1.4
Table 3 Univariable logistic regression: Baseline correlates of failure to reach chimeric antigen receptor T-cell infusion (n = 99; 12 events), n (%)
Variable
Not infused
Infused
OR (95%CI)
P value
Extramedullary disease9/12 (75.0)17/87 (19.5)12.4 (3.0-50.6)< 0.001
Plasma cell leukaemia3/12 (25.0)3/87 (3.4)9.3 (1.6-53.4)0.012
R-ISS stage III (vs I-II)2/11 (18.2)3/66 (4.5)4.7 (0.7-31.9)0.13
High-risk cytogenetics4/11 (36.4)29/85 (34.1)1.10 (0.30-4.05)0.88
Age (per 10 years)Median 70.2Median 67.71.24 (0.71-2.16)0.45
Prior lines of therapyMedian 5Median 5-0.4311
Table 4 Kaplan-Meier estimates and numbers at risk from the date of apheresis
Months from apheresis
0
3
6
12
18
24
30
PFS - infused: At risk878265371661
PFS - infused: % (95%CI)10094.3 (86.7-97.6)81.0 (71.2-87.6)67.9 (56.9-76.8)49.2 (37.5-60.0)32.6 (21.1-44.6)20.9 (9.6-35.2)
PFS - not infused: At risk12210000
PFS - not infused: % (95%CI)10016.7 (2.7-41.3)8.3 (0.5-31.1)0000
OS - infused: At risk8785765027156
OS - infused: % (95%CI)10097.7 (91.1-99.4)94.1 (86.6-97.4)88.6 (79.6-93.8)82.7 (72.2-89.5)75.1 (62.6-84.0)65.7 (48.3-78.5)
OS - not infused: At risk12320000
OS - not infused: % (95%CI)10025.0 (6.0-50.5)20.0 (3.5-46.0)10.0 (0.6-35.8)000

  • Citation: Bangolo A, Gill S, Zhang L, Zhao J, Amoozgar B, Reich-Slotky R, Tran J, Vo T, Mariblanca G, Balulescu X, Mcknight S, Patel N, Reed A, Kaur S, Subramanian S, Katyal J, Manikkuttiyil C, Chakov M, Nguyen A, Pashine S, Khalil A, Mathew S, Gill R, Andrews V, Ordonez P, Olson B, Koleng M, Persaud R, Saride HS, Dharsi M, Thach R, Chen W, Shahid M, Weissman S, Siegel D, Parmar H, Biran N, Vesole DH, Phull P. Real-world outcomes for multiple myeloma patients after apheresis for planned chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. World J Exp Med 2026; 16(3): 125753
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-315x/full/v16/i3/125753.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.125753

Write to the Help Desk