Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 10, 2015; 4(4): 113-123
Published online Nov 10, 2015. doi: 10.5317/wjog.v4.i4.113
Figure 1
Figure 1 PRISMA flow chart showing trial selection methodology. RCT: Randomised controlled trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Summary and strength of the evidence from trials analysed on GradePro®.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Risk of bias generated using cochrane risk of bias assessment tool.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Primary endpoints. A: The forest plot showing fertilisation rate per oocyte injected. Risk ratio is shown with 95%CI; B: The forest plot showing good embryos rate per oocyte injected, risk ratio is shown with 95%CI; C: The forest plot showing live birth rate per cycle. Risk ratio is shown with 95%CI. HA: Hyaluronic acid; PVP: Polyvinylpyrrolidone.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Secondary endpoints. A: The forest plot showing clinical pregnancy rate per transfer. Risk ratio is shown with 95%CI; B: The forest plot showing implantation rate per embryo transferred. Risk ratio is shown with 95%CI. HA: Hyaluronic acid; PVP: Polyvinylpyrrolidone.