临床研究
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
世界华人消化杂志. 2020-07-08; 28(13): 538-543
在线出版 2020-07-08. doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v28.i13.538
表1 三组年龄及性别组成
组别n (入选)n (结束)性别(男/女)年龄(岁, mean±SD)
正常组303010/2028.67±1.12
脐针组303012/1830.97±0.98
益生菌组303011/1930.07±1.11
表2 正常志愿者组及2组患者治疗前后临床症状评分[中位数(25%, 75%)]
组别n观测时点Bristol 评分排便频率VAS评分腹痛频率
正常组304.00 (4.00, 5.00)3.00 (3.00, 3.00)0.00 (0.00, 0.00)0.00 (0.00, 0.00)
脐针组30治疗前6.00 (6.00, 7.00)5.00 (5.00, 6.00)3.00 (2.00, 5.00)1.00 (1.00, 2.00)
治疗后4.00 (4.00, 5.00)a3.00 (3.00, 4.00)a1.00 (0.00, 1.00)a0.00 (0.00, 1.00)a
益生菌组30治疗前7.00 (6.00, 7.00)5.00 (5.00, 6.00)3.00 (2.00, 4.00)1.00 (1.00, 2.00)
治疗后4.00 (4.00, 5.00)a3.00 (3.40, 4.00)a1.00 (0.00, 1.00)a0.00 (0.00, 1.00)a
表3 正常志愿者组及2组患者治疗前后SF-36, 汉密尔顿抑郁量表, 汉密尔顿焦虑量表评分[中位数(25%, 75%)]
组别n观测时点SF-36HAMAHAMD
正常组3079.00 (72.15, 89.00)1.50 (1.00, 6.25)2.00 (1.00, 4.00)
脐针组30治疗前60.00 (54.00, 70.25)11.00 (7.00, 15.00)11.50 (7.75, 14.00)
治疗后80.00 (74.00, 85.25)a4.00 (3.00, 5.25)a4.00 (3.00, 6.00)a
益生菌组30治疗前58.50 (53.75, 66.25)9.50 (6.00, 13.00)10.00 (7.00, 13.00)
治疗后75.00 (72.75, 79.00)a4.00 (2.00, 5.00)a4.00( 2.75, 6.00)a
表4 正常志愿者组及2组患者治疗前后脑肠肽指标(n = 30, mean±SD)
组别观测时点5-HT (ng/mL)CGRP (pg/mL)NO (μmol/L)SP (pg/mL)VIP (pg/mL)
正常组64.68±5.0941.49±1.0547.17±1.3385.60±4.3361.60±3.97
脐针组治疗前240.7±17.74a60.13±1.59a61.58±1.81a135.4±3.40a119.9±3.29a
治疗后106.4±6.46b42.97±1.31b50.13±1.41b89.37±2.83b86.67±3.28b
益生菌组治疗前176.7±17.15a55.66±1.87a57.42±1.54a122.1±5.51a108.9±5.26a
治疗后80.42±5.41bc44.98±0.93b48.66±1.13b87.45±3.50b75.71±3.85bc

引文著录: 俞蕾敏, 张娅丽, 王延武, 叶蔚, 吕宾. 脐针治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征疗效及对脑肠肽的影响. 世界华人消化杂志 2020; 28(13): 538-543