临床实践
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
世界华人消化杂志. 2019-08-08; 27(15): 961-966
在线出版 2019-08-08. doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v27.i15.961
表1 治疗前后两组患者治疗前后临床症状积分比较(mean ± SD)
症状观察组对照组tP
腹痛治疗前2.26 ± 0.512.16 ± 0.461.1650.123
治疗后0.36 ± 0.140.75 ± 0.21-12.3620.000
腹胀治疗前1.22 ± 0.251.16 ± 0.271.3040.097
治疗后0.21 ± 0.060.45 ± 0.17-10.6500.000
纳差治疗前0.69 ± 0.130.65 ± 0.161.5520.062
治疗后0.09 ± 0.050.24 ± 0.06-11.2450.000
嗳气治疗前0.32 ± 0.170.36 ± 0.13-1.4950.069
治疗后0.09 ± 0.040.18 ± 0.05-11.2450.000
反酸治疗前0.30 ± 0.120.32 ± 0.08-1.1090.135
治疗后0.03 ± 0.080.11 ± 0.05-6.7840.000
肢冷治疗前0.35 ± 0.080.38 ± 0.13-1.5720.053
治疗后0.08 ± 0.050.19 ± 0.06-11.2670.000
呕血治疗前0.29 ± 0.120.31 ± 0.06-1.1930.118
治疗后0.00 ± 0.000.02 ± 0.06-2.6670.004
黑便治疗前0.59 ± 0.110.57 ± 0.081.1760.121
治疗后0.00 ± 0.000.03 ± 0.05-4.8000.000
总积分治疗前5.56 ± 0.635.49 ± 0.620.6340.264
治疗后1.08 ± 0.262.25 ± 0.43-18.6270.000
表2 两组患者治疗前后血清炎性因子水平比较(mean ± SD)
测定项目观察组对照组tP
IL-1β (pg/mL)治疗前66.87 ± 15.2165.12 ± 12.640.7070.240
治疗后28.05 ± 10.4244.21 ± 16.23-6.7620.000
IL-6 (pg/mL)治疗前221.63 ± 31.63219.89 ± 35.830.2910.386
治疗后80.98 ± 21.62144.25 ± 26.21-14.8970.000
TNF-α (pg/mL)治疗前182.57 ± 27.35186.37 ± 29.32-0.7580.225
治疗后69.82 ± 11.52139.34 ± 26.21-19.4170.000
IFN-γ (pg/mL)治疗前105.63 ± 27.37108.53 ± 32.54-0.5460.293
治疗后68.48 ± 18.8582.57 ± 21.68-3.9340.000
CRP (mg/L)治疗前28.68 ± 11.0527.84 ± 10.790.4350.332
治疗后11.67 ± 11.5218.66 ± 7.32-4.0970.000
表3 两组患者治疗前后内镜下疗效比较[n = 64, n (%)]
组别痊愈显效有效无效总有效
观察组30 (46.88)8 (28.13)12 (18.75)4 (6.25)60 (93.75)
对照组16 (25.00)20 (31.25)11 (17.19)17 (26.56)47 (73.44)
χ29.627
P0.002

引文著录: 马丽丽, 罗庆盛, 陶金红. 艾司奥美拉唑联合康复新治疗幽门螺杆菌阴性胃溃疡的疗效研究. 世界华人消化杂志 2019; 27(15): 961-966