临床实践
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
世界华人消化杂志. 2018-04-08; 26(10): 616-622
在线出版 2018-04-08. doi: 10.11569/wcjd.v26.i10.616
表1 两组患者基线资料对比 (n = 44, mean ± SD)
分组性别 (男/女)平均年龄 (岁)手术时间 (h)ASA分级 (Ⅰ/Ⅱ)
观察组31/1353.4±4.23.6±1.233/11
对照组30/1453.2±5.13.6±1.132/12
t20.0530.6920.8850.059
P>0.05>0.05>0.05>0.05
表2 两组患者术后VAS评分比较 (n = 44, mean ± SD)
分组术后4 h12 h24 h48 h
观察组3.13±0.692.59±0.481.74±0.361.18±0.29
对照组3.76±0.583.11±0.622.46±0.571.91±0.33
t4.6364.3997.08411.022
P<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05
表3 两组患者血清炎症因子水平比较 (n = 44, mean ± SD)
炎症因子术前术后24 h术后48 h
IL-2 (pg/mL)
观察组188.9 ± 14.781.7 ± 9.9126.8 ± 14.2
对照组187.8 ± 13.954.6 ± 7.481.8 ± 10.3
t0.36114.54417.016
P>0.05<0.05<0.05
IL-6 (pg/mL)
观察组46.6 ± 7.489.9 ± 11.573.6 ± 10.8
对照组46.4 ± 8.3136.7 ± 12.8120.3 ± 12.4
t0.11918.04118.838
P>0.05<0.05<0.05
TNF-α (pg/mL)
观察组9.6 ± 1.433.7 ± 8.827.3 ± 8.1
对照组9.7 ± 1.359.5 ± 4.740.7 ± 4.9
t0.34717.1549.389
P>0.05<0.05<0.05
MCP-1 (ng/mL)
观察组25.3 ± 4.438.8 ± 4.731.7 ± 3.5
对照组25.8 ± 4.258.4 ± 7.949.9 ± 5.8
t0.54514.14317.821
P>0.05<0.05<0.05
HMGB-1 (ng/mL)
观察组6.7 ± 0.910.6 ± 1.78.4 ± 1.2
对照组6.8 ± 0.717.8 ± 2.513.6 ± 1.3
t0.58215.79719.497
P>0.05<0.05<0.05
表4 两组患者术前、术后应激反应比较 (n = 44, mean ± SD)
相关因子术前术后24 h术后48 h
ET (ng/L)
观察组50.83 ± 9.5543.64 ± 10.4741.72 ± 8.77
对照组49.91 ± 9.3752.48 ± 10.7947.36 ± 9.98
t0.4563.9002.816
P>0.05<0.05<0.05
Ang Ⅱ (ng/L)
观察组40.85 ± 11.6343.29 ± 10.9441.46 ± 11.64
对照组40.47 ± 12.7149.76 ± 11.8646.93 ± 12.52
t0.1462.7842.122
P>0.05<0.05<0.05
表5 两组患者手术前、后免疫功能对比 (n = 44, mean ± SD)
时间点CD3CD4CD8NK细胞
手术前
观察组67.52 ± 8.9536.74 ± 9.1726.63 ± 7.8125.84 ± 6.68
对照组65.97 ± 9.4235.39 ± 9.6325.89 ± 7.7524.65 ± 7.41
t0.7910.6920.4460.791
P>0.05>0.05>0.05>0.05
手术后24 h
观察组54.66 ± 8.5328.83 ± 9.5227.42 ± 8.5720.82 ± 8.23
对照组43.79 ± 9.1423.67 ± 8.2626.85 ± 8.3515.71 ± 7.86
t5.7672.7160.3162.978
P<0.05<0.05>0.05<0.05
表6 两组患者术后不良反应比较 [n = 44, n(%)]
分组恶心呕吐头晕头痛皮肤瘙痒低血压呼吸抑制发生率 (%)
联合组2 (4.55)1 (2.27)1 (2.27)1 (2.27)0 (0.00)11.36
对照组4 (9.09)3 (6.82)3 (6.82)2 (4.55)1 (2.27)29.55
χ24.469
P<0.05

引文著录: 邵雅洁, 廖志品, 吴延诲. 地佐辛和芬太尼分别复合罗哌卡因在胃癌患者中的应用效果对比观察. 世界华人消化杂志 2018; 26(10): 616-622