BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 8, 2026; 7(1): 117988
Published online Mar 8, 2026. doi: 10.37126/aige.v7.i1.117988
Table 1 Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in capsule endoscopy1
Lesion type
Ref.
Model
Capsule type
Number of training images
Performance metrics
GI hemorrhageJia et al[38]Deep CNN for bleeding detectionSmall bowel10000 images (bleeding and non-bleeding)Improved precision, recall
Spada et al[35]A multicenter study utilizing AI-assisted reading of lesionsSmall bowel158235 imagesReading time reduced: 33.7 min → 3.8 minutes (P < 0.0001); improved accuracy
Erosions and ulcersRibeiro et al[40]CNN model for colonic ulcersColon capsule37319 (3570 with lesions)Sensitivity: 96.9%, specificity: 99.9%
Vascular lesionsMascarenhas et al[42]Multicenter study utilizing CNNSmall bowel and colon capsule34665 (11091 with lesions)Diagnostic accuracy: 95%, sensitivity: 86.4%, specificity: 98.3%
Polyps and tumorsKjølhede et al[44]Systematic review and meta-analysis for the detection of polyps < 6 mm to ≥ 10 mmCCE-2Combined across studiesSensitivity: 85%-87%, specificity: 85%-95%
Polyps and tumors Moen et al[45]Systematic review of AI models for polyp or colorectal neoplasia detectionCCE-2Varied across studies (thousands to 30000) Per-frame sensitivity: 47.4%-98.1%, specificity: 87.0%-96.3%; per-lesion sensitivity: 81.3%–98.1%


Write to the Help Desk