©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 8, 2026; 7(1): 114426
Published online Mar 8, 2026. doi: 10.37126/aige.v7.i1.114426
Published online Mar 8, 2026. doi: 10.37126/aige.v7.i1.114426
Table 1 Machine learning models for the prediction of gastrointestinal bleed
| Supervised machine learning | |||
| Classification task | Comment | Regression task | Comment |
| K-nearest neighbours | Data classification as per k-nearest neighbours, non-parametric | Gradient boosting model | A combination of weaker models (e.g., a decision tree) to create a stronger prediction model |
| XGBoost | |||
| LightGBM | |||
| CatBoost | |||
| Neural network | Deep learning method composed of interconnected layers of artificial neurons | Support vector machine | Technique to categorise data points by finding an optimal hyperplane |
| ANN | |||
| CNN | |||
| Decision tree | An arranged tree in which internal nodes are attributes, branches are decisions, and leaves are outcomes or labels | Regression analysis | Useful for predicting time-to-event outcomes, including covariates and event times, such as bleeding recurrence |
- Citation: Kumar SR, Panigrahi MK, Sasmal PK. Artificial intelligence in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Can machine learning predict endotherapy requirements? Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 7(1): 114426
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2689-7164/full/v7/i1/114426.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.37126/aige.v7.i1.114426