Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
Artif Intell Gastroenterol. Aug 8, 2026; 7(2): 116057
Published online Aug 8, 2026. doi: 10.35712/aig.v7.i2.116057
Published online Aug 8, 2026. doi: 10.35712/aig.v7.i2.116057
Table 8 Comparative characteristics of portal vein embolization, liver venous deprivation, and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy
| Feature | PVE | LVD | ALPPS |
| Typical study design | Retrospective cohorts | Retrospective + prospective pilot | Retrospective ALPPS registry |
| Sample size range | 0-50 | 0-40 | 0-70 |
| Median hypertrophy (%) | 0-37 | 0-50 | 0-60 |
| Time to hypertrophy (days) | 2-21 | 8-10 | 0-7 |
| Failure-to-resect rate (%) | 0-5 | 0 | 0 |
| 90-day morbidity (%) | 0-10 | 5-10 | 5-35 |
| 90-day mortality (%) | 0 | 0 | 2-8 |
| Key limitations | Collateral formation | More complex, higher dysfunction risk | Highest morbidity and selection bias |
- Citation: Agrawal H, Gupta N, Tanwar H. Artificial intelligence in expanding hepatic resection boundaries: Integrating portal flow modulation and regenerative strategies. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2026; 7(2): 116057
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2644-3236/full/v7/i2/116057.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.35712/aig.v7.i2.116057