Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
Artif Intell Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2021; 2(6): 141-156
Published online Dec 28, 2021. doi: 10.35712/aig.v2.i6.141
Table 2 Artificial intelligence-based applications in gastric cancer
Ref.
Task
No. of cases/data set
Method
Performance
Duraipandian et al[89]Classification700 slidesGastricNetAccuracy (100%)
Cosatto et al[72]> 12000 WSIsMILAUC (0.96)
Sharma et al[31]454 casesCNNAccuracy (69%)
Qu et al[90]9720 imagesDLAUCs (up to 0.97)
Yoshida et al[32]3062 gastric biopsiesMLOverall concordance rate (55.6%)
León et al[91]40 imagesCNN Accuracy (up to 89.7%)
Liang et al[92]1900 images DLAccuracy (91.1%)
Sun et al[93]500 images DL Accuracy (91.6%)
Tomita et al[94]502 images1Attention-based DLAccuracy (83%)
Wang et al[95]608 images Recalibrated multi-instance-DLAccuracy (86.5%)
Iizuka et al[33]1746 biopsy WSIs CNN, RNN Accuracy (95.6%), AUCs (up to 0.98)
Bollschweiler et al[41]Prognosis135 cases ANN Accuracy (93%)
Hensler et al[42]4302 casesQUEEN techniqueAccuracy (72.73%)
Jagric et al[43]213 casesLearning vector quantization NNSensitivity (71%), specificity (96.1%)
Lu et al[36]939 casesMMHGAccuracy (69.28%)
Jiang et al[37]786 cases SVM classifier AUCs (up to 0.83)
Liu et al[40]432 tissue samples SVM classifierAccuracy (up to 94.19%)
Korhani Kangi and Bahrampour[38]339 casesANN, BNNSensitivity (88.2% for ANN, 90.3% for BNN)Specificity (95.4% for ANN, 90.9% for BNN)
Zhang et al[39]669 casesMLAUCs (up to 0.831)
García et al[44]Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes3257 imagesCNNAccuracy (96.9%)
Kather et al[56]Genetic alterations1147 cases2Deep residual learning AUC (0.81 for gastric cancer)
Kather et al[47]> 1000 cases3NN AUC (up to 0.8)
Fu et al[57]> 1000 cases4NN Variable across tumors/gene alterations. Strongest relations in whole genome duplications