BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
Artif Intell Cancer. Sep 8, 2026; 7(1): 119655
Published online Sep 8, 2026. doi: 10.35713/aic.119655
Table 1 Examples of artificial intelligence applications in liver disease diagnosis
Disease
Model
Algorithms
Advantages
Disadvantages
Ref.
MASHABD-LTyGLASSO regressionMultiomics data (proteomics and transcriptomics); outperforms traditional assessments such as FIB-4, NFS, and APRIReliance on specific biomarkers such as TREM2, IL18BP, and LGALS3BP; validation in a relatively small cohort; complex componentsZhang et al[12], 2025
FibrosisALADDINRandom forest, gradient boosting machines, and XGBoostUses common laboratory parameters with or without VCTE, superior to FIB-4, SAFE, and LiverRisk scores, and noninferior to the FAST Score; includes a user-friendly web-based calculatorData interpretation lacks expert consensus; limitations in extrapolation of this model to all patients with MASLDAlkhouri et al[22], 2026
FibrosisLiverAIDBasic ML algorithms, including random forest, elastic net, bagging classification trees, and support vector machineEffective for ruling out significant liver fibrosis; outperforms conventional blood-based indices, including FIB-4, Forns index, and APRI; validated in a large populationRegional study; internal validation onlyBlanes-Vidal et al[27], 2022
HCCPLAN-B Gradient-boosting machine (GBM) Validated in two independent cohorts with large, multicenter populations; provides better discrimination than previous models (PAGE-B, modified PAGE-B, REACH-B, and CU-HCC)Limited generalizability across ethnicities and viral genotypes; potential selection bias; lacks metabolic risk factors and liver stiffness dataKim et al[31], 2022


Write to the Help Desk