Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
Artif Intell Cancer. Sep 8, 2026; 7(1): 114273
Published online Sep 8, 2026. doi: 10.35713/aic.v7.i1.114273
Published online Sep 8, 2026. doi: 10.35713/aic.v7.i1.114273
Table 5 Major limitations and challenges of organoid models in gastric precancerous lesion research
| Category | Specific challenge/issue | Supporting evidence/explanation | Ref. |
| Research focus | Relative scarcity of precancerous lesion models | Current studies predominantly focus on advanced gastric cancers, with limited research on constructing organoid models for atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia | [17] |
| Model fidelity and complexity | Lack of tumor microenvironment (TME) components | Existing models primarily consist of epithelial cells and lack critical TME components (immune cells, stromal cells, intratumoral microbiota), unable to fully replicate essential interactions (e.g., with H. pylori) | [16-18,54,64,65] |
| Inability to recapitulate systemic physiology | Constraints in fully recapitulating vascular systems, innervation, and interactions with systemic physiological processes | [17] | |
| Standardization and reproducibility | Lack of standardized protocols | Significant challenges exist in organoid culture methodologies, analytical techniques, and data interpretation, compromising reproducibility and reliability | [17,67] |
| Model qualification gap | Absent standardized qualification processes undermine confidence in models' physiological relevance | [55] | |
| Scalability and practicality | Challenges in scalability and cost | Limitations in scalability, reproducibility, cost-effectiveness, and time efficiency. Relatively long culture cycle, variable success rates, batch-to-batch variations, and high costs limit large-scale application | [54,55,68-70] |
| Model validation and comparison | Unclear representativeness | Whether organoids fully represent all characteristics of the original lesional tissue requires further validation. Inconsistent culture success rates and extended cycles are current drawbacks | [15] |
| Lack of comparative studies | Notable absence of head-to-head studies comparing organoids against more established models (e.g., animal models, ALI models) to clarify their unique advantages and optimal applications | [6,67] | |
| Clinical translation | Limited direct clinical evidence | Organoids are primarily used in basic research. Direct evidence for application in clinical diagnostics (e.g., predicting progression risk) remains scarce, and the technology remains distant from direct clinical implementation | [17,61,62,67] |
- Citation: Wu CH, Qiu JX, Jia YB, Quan Y, Liu C, Ling JH. Synergistic applications of artificial intelligence and organoid technology in gastric precancerous lesion research: Mechanisms, translation, and challenges. Artif Intell Cancer 2026; 7(1): 114273
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2644-3228/full/v7/i1/114273.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.35713/aic.v7.i1.114273