Case Control Study
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 16, 2014; 2(10): 534-540
Published online Oct 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i10.534
Table 1 Evaluation of clinical parameters from pre-operative to 6 mo post-operative period for group I-gingival massaging using a placebo (Clarified butter) (n = 30)
Clinical parametersBaseline (mean ± SD)6 mo (mean ± SD)P-value (significance)
Recession height1.7 ± 0.651.5 ± 0.510.034
Recession width3.8 ± 0.663.57 ± 0.630.100
Probing pocket depth1.9 ± 0.401.5 ± 0.510.001b (S)
Clinical attachment level3.5 ± 0.823 ± 0.870.002b (S)
Thickness of keratinized tissue0.84 ± 0.180.97 ± 0.21< 0.001b (S)
Width of attached gingiva2.53 ± 0.572.8 ± 0.550.011
Table 2 Evaluation of clinical parameters from pre-operative to 6 mo post-operative period for group-II gingival massaging using an ayurvedic oil (iremedadi taila) (n = 30)
Clinical parametersBaseline (mean ± SD)6 mo (mean ± SD)P-value (significance)
Recession height1.77 ± 0.631.27 ± 0.580.003b (S)
Recession width3.3 ± 0.462.23 ± 0.43< 0.001b (S)
Probing pocket depth1.47 ± 0.501.63 ± 0.490.096 (NS)
Clinical attachment level3.23 ± 0.822.9 ± 0.760.064 (NS)
Thickness of keratinized tissue0.85 ± 0.171.07 ± 0.19< 0.001b (S)
Width of attached gingiva2.37 ± 0.562.9 ± 0.660.001b (S)
Table 3 Evaluation of clinical parameters from pre-operative to 6 mo post-operative period for Group-III semilunar coronally repositioned flap (n = 30)
Clinical parametersBaseline6 moP-value
(mean ± SD)(mean ± SD)(significance)
Recession height2.33 ± 0.550.57 ± 0.50< 0.001b (S)
Recession width3.33 ± 0.761.1 ± 0.66< 0.001b (S)
Probing pocket depth1.57 ± 0.501.33 ± 0.480.071
Clinical attachment level3.87 ± 0.731.9 ± 0.66< 0.001b (S)
Thickness of keratinized tissue0.97 ± 0.191.38 ± 0.23< 0.001b (S)
Width of attached gingiva2.63 ± 0.713.37 ± 0.560.001 (S)
Table 4 Comparison of clinical parameters from pre-operative to 6 mo post-operative period between the three groups using Kruskal Wallis test1
Clinical parameterGroup IGroup IIGroup IIIχ2P-value (significance)
Recession height0.2 ± 0.480.5 ± 0.781.77 ± 0.7347.56< 0.001b (S)
Recession width0.23 ± 0.771.07 ± 0.582.23 ± 0.8251.28< 0.001b (S)
Probing pocket depth0.4 ± 0.49-0.17 ± 0.530.23 ± 0.6813.29< 0.001b (S)
Clinical attachment level0.5 ± 0.730.33 ± 0.961.97 ± 0.8142.01< 0.001b (S)
Thickness of keratinized tissue-0.13 ± 0.12-0.23 ± 0.15-0.41 ± 0.2722.86< 0.001b (S)
Width of attached gingiva-0.27 ± 0.52- 0.53 ± 0.68-0.73 ± 0.987.030.03 (NS)
Table 5 Comparison of clinical parameters between group 3 vs group 2 using Mann-Whitney U test
Clinical parameterZ valueP value (significance)
Recession height-5.064< 0.001b (S)
Recession width-4.996< 0.001b (S)
Probing pocket depth-2.4550.014
Clinical attachment level-5.390< 0.001b (S)
Thickness of keratinized tissue-2.8410.004 (S)
Width of attached gingiva
Table 6 Comparison of clinical parameters between group 3 vs group 1 using Mann-Whitney U test
Clinical parameterZ valueP value (significance)
Recession height-6.366< 0.001b (S)
Recession width-6.141< 0.001b (S)
Probing pocket depth-0.8550.392
Clinical attachment level-5.682< 0.001b (S)
Thickness of keratinized tissue-4.441< 0.001b (S)
Width of attached gingiva
Table 7 Comparison of clinical parameters between group 2 vs group 1 using Mann-Whitney U test
Clinical parameterZ valueP value (significance)
Recession height-1.7720.076
Recession Width-4.330< 0.001b (S)
Probing pocket depth-3.734< 0.001b (S)
Clinical attachment level-1.4940.135
Thickness of keratinized tissue-2.5790.01b (S)
Width of attached gingiva