Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2022; 10(13): 4119-4130
Published online May 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4119
Table 1 Characteristics of included studies
Ref.
Year
Country
Sample size
Surgery type
Intervention
Control
Initial training pressure (%)
Training time (min/d)
Sessions (n/wk)
Duration (wk)
Weiner et al[22]1997IsraelIMT: 17, Con: 15NRPreoperative and postoperative IMT, incentive spirometryUsual care1560614
Brocki et al[23]2016DenmarkIMT: 34, Con: 34VATS: 35, thoracotomy: 33Preoperative IMT 30% MIP, postoperative: 15% MIP, breathing exercises, early mobilizationBreathing exercises, early mobilization301572
Brocki et al[24]2018DenmarkIMT: 34, Con: 34VATS: 35, thoracotomy: 33Preoperative IMT 30% MIP, postoperative: 15% MIP, breathing exercises, early mobilizationBreathing exercises, early mobilization301572
Taşkin et al[25]2018TurkeyRMT: 20, Con: 20ThoracotomyPostoperative RMT, chest physiotherapy, early mobilizationChest physiotherapy, early mobilization15Six sessions consisting of 3 sets of 10 breaths5NR
Messaggi-Sartor et al[26]2019SpainRMT: 16, Con: 21VATS: 3, thoracotomy: 34Postoperative RMT, aerobic exerciseUsual care306038
Kendall et al[27]2020PortugalIMT: 13, EMT: 13, IMT + EMT: 18, Con: 19ThoracotomyPostoperative IMT or EMT or IMT + EMT, usual careUsual care251578
Laurent et al[28]2020FranceRMT: 14, Con: 12VATS or thoracotomyPreoperative RMT, usual chest physical therapyUsual chest physical therapy303043
Table 2 Quality assessment for included trials according to Physiotherapy Evidence Database scoring scale
Ref.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Total score
Weiner et al[22]NYNYNNNNYYY5/10
Brocki et al[23]YYYYNNNYYYY7/10
Brocki et al[24]YYYYNNNYYYY7/10
Taşkin et al[25]YYNYNNYYYYY7/10
Messaggi-Sartor et al[26]YYNYNNYYYYY7/10
Kendall et al[27]YYNYNNNYYYY6/10
Laurent et al[28]YYNYNNNYYYY6/10
Table 3 Subgroup analysis about primary outcomes

No. of studies
Mean
95%CI
P value
I2 (%)
Pheterogeneity
MIP
Intervention time
Preoperative112.33-5.49, 5.49> 0.999--
Postoperative212.333.55, 21.110.0060.00.67
Training method
IMT39.533.98, 15.08< 0.001440.17
EMT19.00-9.00, 27.000.33-0.13
RMT36.97-2.81, 16.740.1664-
MEP
Intervention time
Preoperative12718.67, 35.33< 0.001--
Postoperative215.83-1.80, 33.450.08580.12
Training method
IMT2-3.49-10.57, 3.600.3300.65
EMT11.70-14.67 to 18.070.84--
RMT320.728.60, 32.84< 0.001600.08
Table 4 Results about the effect of respiratory muscle training on patients receiving lung resection

No. of studies
Mean
95%CI
P value
I2 (%)
Pheterogeneity
Primary outcomes
Respiratory function
MIP (cmH2O)58.131.31, 14.950.02660.02
MEP (cmH2O)413.51-4.47, 31.480.1491< 0.001
Secondary outcomes
Physical activity2--0.006/0.035--
Exercise capacity
6MWD (m)39.96-34.61, 54.540.66630.06
CPET/VO2peak (mL/min/kg)22.44-2.36, 7.240.3296< 0.001
Pulmonary function
FEV1 (L)30.06-0.07, 0.190.39130.32
FVC (L)20.29-0.05, 0.640.1000.96
Quality of life
Pain (VAS)20.67-0.99, 2.320.43610.11
Dyspnoea (VAS)2-0.16-0.58, 0.250.4400.61
EORTC QLQ-C301-----