Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2021; 9(36): 11330-11337
Published online Dec 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11330
Published online Dec 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11330
Table 4 Comparison of neonatal blood gas indexes between birthing ball group and conventional group (mean ± SD)
| Group | n | pH | PO2 (mmHg) | PCO2 (mmHg) | 1-min Apgar (Scores) |
| Delivery ball group | 100 | 7.34 ± 0.05 | 27.51 ± 3.61 | 42.70 ± 4.86 | 9.10 ± 0.38 |
| Regular group | 100 | 7.33 ± 0.05 | 26.83 ± 2.76 | 43.84 ± 4.40 | 8.94 ± 0.31 |
| t | 1.414 | 1.496 | -1.739 | 3.263 | |
| P value | 0.159 | 0.136 | 0.084 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Shen HC, Wang H, Sun B, Jiang LZ, Meng Q. Birthing ball on promoting cervical ripening and its influence on the labor process and the neonatal blood gas index. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(36): 11330-11337
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i36/11330.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11330