Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2021; 9(27): 8027-8034
Published online Sep 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8027
Table 1 Comparison of image quality scores between two-dimensional ultrasonography and three-dimensional ultrasonography (mean ± SD, points)
Group
Number
Sulcus, fissure, and gyrus display
Choroid plexus ependymal display
Blood flow display
Tissue specificity
Resolution
Visual field
Positioning
Two-dimensional ultrasonography1132.53 ± 0.342.49 ± 0.232.38 ± 0.302.44 ± 0.252.59 ± 0.182.63 ± 0.212.85 ± 0.12
Three-dimensional ultrasonography1131.97 ± 0.302.12 ± 0.251.98 ± 0.262.03 ± 0.202.31 ± 0.222.25 ± 0.192.61 ± 0.14
t13.12911.57810.71113.61310.47114.26413.836
P value0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000