Comparison of different methods of nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients: A meta-analysis

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 9, Issue 26

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2021; 9(26): 7772-7785
Published online Sep 16, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7772

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Selection process of the studies included in the review.

Citation: Ou GW, Li H, Shao B, Huang LM, Chen GM, Li WC. Comparison of different methods of nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients: A meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(26): 7772-7785
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i26/7772.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7772

Ou GW, Li H, Shao B, Huang LM, Chen GM, Li WC. Comparison of different methods of nasogastric tube insertion in anesthetized and intubated patients: A meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(26): 7772-7785 [PMID: 34621827 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i26.7772]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.