©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2021; 9(15): 3586-3596
Published online May 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i15.3586
Published online May 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i15.3586
Table 4 Efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of bowel preparation
| Variables | Score |
| OBPS (mean) | |
| Ascending | 1.4 |
| Mid | 0.9 |
| Rectosigmoid | 0.8 |
| Total colon fluid | 0.5 |
| Overall (mean ± SD) | 3.6 ± 0.312 |
| Quality of bowel preparation, n (%) | |
| Success rate (OBPS ≤ 7) | 58 (93.55) |
| Excellence rate (OBPS ≤ 4) | 42 (67.74) |
| Polyp detection rate (%) | 36.9 |
| Supplementary water intake (mL) | 3000 (2250, 3800) |
| Sleep quality-VAS | 0 (0, 6) |
| Anal pain-VAS | 0 (0, 6) |
| Ease of drinking-VAS | 10 (4, 10) |
| Taste-VAS | 10 (5, 10) |
- Citation: Liu FX, Wang L, Yan WJ, Zou LC, Cao YA, Lin XC. Cleansing efficacy and safety of bowel preparation protocol using sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate considering subjective experiences: An observational study. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(15): 3586-3596
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i15/3586.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i15.3586