Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2020; 8(9): 1608-1619
Published online May 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i9.1608
Table 6 Analysis of lymph node metastasis according to sex using a logistic regression model
CharacteristicMale
Female
P valueOR95%CIP valueOR95%CI
Age
≤ 60 yr1.0001.000
> 60 yr0.9191.0120.804-1.2740.5121.1270.789-1.610
Tumour size
≤ 5 cm1.0001.000
> 5 cm0.0010.5320.418-0.6770.0060.6050.425-0.863
Lymphovascular invasion
No1.0001.000
Yes0.0010.3590.284-0.4530.0010.3570.254-0.501
Depth of invasion
Muscularis propria0.6840.8230.323-2.0980.1900.3870.094-1.601
Sub-serosal0.7350.8520.338-2.1490.2980.4740.116-1.035
Serosal exposed0.9341.0400.409-2.6450.5850.6730.163-2.779
Serosal invasion0.8171.1430.369-3.5401.0001.0000.160-6.255
Histology
Tubular adenocarcinoma (well)1.0001.000
Tubular adenocarcinoma (moderate)0.0440.4890.244-0.9800.8531.1570.247-5.405
Tubular adenocarcinoma (poor)0.0470.4970.249-0.9920.7261.3120.288-5.979
Signet ring cell carcinoma0.1220.5430.251-1.1770.5201.6730.349-8.015
Mucinous adenocarcinoma0.0480.4110.170-0.9920.9451.0650.178-6.387