Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2020; 8(9): 1608-1619
Published online May 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i9.1608
Table 5 Analysis of lymph node metastasis using the chi-squared test and a logistic regression model
CharacteristicLymph node metastasis
Univariate
Multivariate
YesNoP valueOR95%CIP value
Sex
Male766 (71)618 (66.7)0.0401.000
Female313 (29)308 (33.3)0.8400.682-1.0340.099
Age
≤ 60 yr573 (53.1)496 (53.6)0.8371.000
> 60 yr506 (46.9)430 (46.4)1.0350.854-1.2550.726
Tumour size
≤ 5 cm580 (53.8)316 (34.1)0.0011.000
> 5 cm499 (46.2)610 (65.9)0.5520.453-0.6740.001
Lymphovascular invasion
Yes415 (38.5)608 (65.7)0.0010.3560.294-0.4310.001
No664 (61.5)318 (34.3)1.000
Depth of invasion
Muscularis propria252 (23.4)252 (27.2)0.6470.297-1.4090.273
Sub-serosal453 (42)412 (44.5)0.7110.329-1.5370.386
Serosal exposed327 (30.3)233 (25.2)0.9080.418-1.9750.808
Serosal invasion30 (2.8)18 (1.9)1.0780.414-2.8090.877
Histology
Tubular adenocarcinoma (well)46 (4.3)16 (1.8)0.0111.000
Tubular adenocarcinoma (moderate)342 (32.3)282 (31)0.5600.301-1.0430.068
Tubular adenocarcinoma (poorly)519 (49)473 (52)0.5830.315-1.0800.086
Signet ring cell carcinoma119 (11.2)100 (11)0.6760.347-1.3180.251
Mucinous adenocarcinoma33 (3.1)38 (4.2)0.4740.218-1.0290.059