©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 26, 2020; 8(20): 4793-4806
Published online Oct 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4793
Published online Oct 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4793
Table 2 Utilities used in the base case analysis
| Health state | Utility (SE) | Source |
| Sweden | ||
| Midgut-NET progression-free survival | 0.79 (0.01) | Real world evidence1 |
| Midgut-NET post-progression survival | 0.74 (0.01) | ERASMUS study2 |
| P-NET progression-free survival | 0.80 (0.01) | ERASMUS study2 |
| P-NET post-progression survival | 0.79 (0.02) | ERASMUS study2 |
| Norway | ||
| Midgut-NET progression-free survival (Lutathera) | 0.75 (0.01) | NETTER-1[13] |
| Midgut-NET post-progression survival | 0.74 (0.01) | ERASMUS study2 |
| P-NET progression-free survival | 0.80 (0.01) | ERASMUS study2 |
| P-NET post-progression survival | 0.79 (0.02) | ERASMUS study2 |
- Citation: Palmer J, Leeuwenkamp OR. Cost-effectiveness of lutetium (177Lu) oxodotreotide vs everolimus in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Norway and Sweden. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(20): 4793-4806
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i20/4793.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i20.4793