Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 8, Issue 19

Peer-Review Report of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Case Control Study

World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2020; 8(19): 4311-4319
Published online Oct 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4311

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Lesion excision by electric hook.

Citation: Shen JM, Zhao JY, Ye T, Gong LF, Wang HP, Chen WJ, Cai YK. Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(19): 4311-4319
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i19/4311.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4311

Shen JM, Zhao JY, Ye T, Gong LF, Wang HP, Chen WJ, Cai YK. Transanal minimally invasive surgery vs endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal benign tumors and rectal carcinoids: A retrospective analysis. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(19): 4311-4319 [PMID: 33083390 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i19.4311]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.