©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2020; 8(16): 3493-3502
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3493
Published online Aug 26, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3493
Table 3 Remission and recurrence of hepatic cancer patients undergoing hepatic artery embolization chemotherapy (transcatheter arterial chemoembolization)
| Group | Remission | Relapse | χ2 | P value |
| Classification of HCC | 9.44 | < 0.05 | ||
| Massive type, n = 71 | 58 | 13 | ||
| Nodular type, n = 80 | 47 | 33 | ||
| Diffuse type, n = 11 | 7 | 4 | ||
| Preoperative staging | 30.59 | < 0.05 | ||
| II stage, n = 97 | 83 | 14 | ||
| III stage, n = 65 | 29 | 36 | ||
| Child-Pugh | 60.08 | < 0.05 | ||
| Child A, n = 42 | 34 | 8 | ||
| Child B, n = 88 | 74 | 14 | ||
| Child C, n = 32 | 4 | 28 | ||
| AFP level | 0.87 | > 0.05 | ||
| > 400 ng/mL, n = 124 | 86 | 38 | ||
| 20-400 ng/mL, n = 10 | 8 | 2 | ||
| < 20 ng/mL, n = 28 | 18 | 10 |
- Citation: Guo Z, Wang J, Li L, Liu R, Fang J, Tie B. Value of miR-1271 and glypican-3 in evaluating the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8(16): 3493-3502
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v8/i16/3493.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i16.3493