Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2020; 8(1): 20-28
Published online Jan 6, 2020. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i1.20
Table 2 Result of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography between acute or obtuse angle in both group, n (%)
Beginner endoscopist
Expert endoscopist
Total (n = 69)Acute angle (n = 37)Obtuse angle (n = 32)P valueTotal (n = 69)Acute angle (n = 36)Obtuse angle (n = 33)P value
Success rate67 (97.1)35 (94.6)32 (100)0.18768 (98.6)36 (100)32 (97)0.293
Cannulation time5.5 ± 6.06.7 ± 7.24.1 ± 4.20.0764.3 ± 2.94.2 ± 2.94.3 ± 2.90.833
Total procedure19.6 ± 10.320.7 ± 11.218.3 ± 9.20.33017.7 ± 7.516.8 ± 4.418.8 ± 9.90.296
P-duct insertion or injection22 (31.9)14 (37.8)8 (25.0)0.26010 (17.4)6 (22.2)4 (12.1)0.276
P-duct stent19 (27.5)12 (32.4)7 (21.9)0.3357 (10.1)4 (11.1)3 (9.1)0.785
PEP9 (13.0)8 (21.6)1 (3.1)0.023a3 (4.3)1 (2.8)2 (6.1)0.511
Hyperamylase-mia12 (17.4)6 (16.2)6 (18.8)0.78612 (17.4)6 (16.7)6 (18.2)0.868
Bleeding2 (2.9)1 (2.7)1 (3.1)0.9181 (1.4)0 (0)1 (3.0)0.293
Perforation0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)N/A0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)N/A