Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 26, 2019; 7(8): 940-950
Published online Apr 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i8.940
Table 3 Relationship between electrocardiography repolarization variables and echocardiographic diastolic parameters using a stepwise multiple regression model
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
BetaP-valueBetaP-valueBetaP-value
QT interval (ms)
A (cm/s)0.1520.0020.0330.4350.0280.504
DT (ms)0.244< 0.0010.194< 0.0010.182< 0.001
LAV (mL)0.312< 0.0010.271< 0.0010.248< 0.001
QTc interval (ms)
A (cm/s)0.324< 0.0010.186< 0.0010.178< 0.001
E/A-0.288< 0.001-0.1310.001-0.1050.008
LAV (mL)0.209< 0.0010.1520.0020.1050.019
LAVI (mL/m2)0.255< 0.0010.181< 0.0010.1420.003
Tpe (ms)
A (cm/s)0.189< 0.0010.1020.0150.0990.016
E/A-0.1550.002-0.0570.153-0.0350.355
LAV (mL)0.1570.0010.1190.0140.1670.120
LAVI (mL/m2)0.1480.0030.0980.0390.0800.086
Tpec (ms)
E (cm/s)-0.1210.014-0.0620.185-0.0320.489
A (cm/s)0.237< 0.0010.150< 0.0010.143< 0.001
E/A-2.223< 0.001-0.1260.002-0.0980.010
LAV (mL)0.0990.0450.0590.2330.0150.749
Tpe/QT
E (cm/s)-0.1380.005-0.1000.030-0.0660.152
A (cm/s)0.1570.0010.0990.0170.0970.018
E/A-0.175< 0.001-0.1110.005-0.0830.028
Tpe/QTc
DT (ms)0.1020.0380.0780.1010.0720.139
LAV (mL)0.1000.0410.0790.1000.0370.388