Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 6, 2019; 7(3): 300-310
Published online Feb 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i3.300
Table 4 Pearson’s chi-squared test comparison between the three study arms’ clinical and laboratory factors at 24 h
Control armArm 1Arm 2Chi-squareP
Amylasemia at 24 h11.8350.019
< 3 × ULN91.8%100.0%71.4%
> 3 × ULN8.2%0.0%28.6%
Lipasemia at 24 h9.8890.029
< 3 × ULN91.8%87.5%71.4%
> 3 × ULN8.2%12.5%28.6%
CRP at 24 h12.8240.046
Normal49.0%43.8%64.3%
Mild increase20.4%0.0%7.1%
Moderate increase22.4%56.2%21.4%
Severe increase8.2%0.0%7.1%
Clinico-biologic status at 24 h2.7930.247
PEP absent91.8%87.5%78.6%
PEP8.2%12.5%21.4%