Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 6, 2019; 7(3): 300-310
Published online Feb 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i3.300
Table 3 Pearson’s chi-squared test comparison between the three study arms’ clinical and laboratory factors at 6 h
Control armArm 1Arm 2Chi-squareP
Amylasemia at 6 h4.2880.368
< 3 × ULN81.6%100.0%85.7%
> 3 × ULN18.4%0.0%14.3%
Lipasemia at 6 h10.0460.040
< 3 × ULN69.4%68.7%71.4%
> 3 × ULN30.6%31.3%28.6%
CRP at 6 h12.1650.058
Normal49.0%56.2%57.1%
Mild increase20.4%12.5%35.7%
Moderate increase26.5%31.2%0.0%
Severe increase4.1%0.0%7.1%
Clinico-biologic status at 6 h0.3970.820
PEP absent91.8%87.5%92.9%
PEP8.2%12.5%7.1%