Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2019; 7(18): 2687-2703
Published online Sep 26, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i18.2687
Table 10 Studies regarding predictors of rebleeding and mortality in patients with upper digestive bleeding (nonvariceal/all causes)
StudyYrConditionType of study
No. of patientsMean age (yr)Mortality rate, (%)Rebleeding rate (%)Predictive factors for mortalityOdds ratio, (OR)Predictive factors for rebleedingOdds ratio, (OR)Surgery (%)
Prospective/retrospectiveUni-/multicentric
Barkun et al[1]2004NVUDBRM86966 ± 175.414.1(1) PPI use; (2) Endoscopic therapy(1) 0.18; (2) 0.31(1) PPI use; (2) Endoscopic hemostasis in patients with high risk stigmata(1) 0.53; (2) 0.396.5
Travis et al[6]2008NVUDBRM23667NA7.1%, 16.4%, 37.0%, 75.0% and 100% for zero, one, two, three or four risk factorsNANA(1) Use of PPI postprocedure; (2) Endo-scopically demonstrated bleeding; (3) Hemostasis with epineph-rine monotherapy; (4) Postprocedure i.v or LMWH use; (5) Moderate/severe liver disease; (6) Peptic ulcer as the source of bleeding(1) 0.25; (2) 2; (3) 3.35; (4) 8.09; (5) 4.92NA
Sung et al[7]2010PUBPU1042861.0 (sur-vivors)6.232.93(1) Use of NSAIDs/ aspirin; (2) Active bleeding ulcer; (3) Cloth/vessel at the base of ulcer; (4) Hemodymamic shock (bleeding-related death)(1) 3.70; (2) 12.96; (3) 12.29; (4) 3.75NANA2.8 (deaths during surgery)
72.5 (deaths)
Zhang et al[8]2010NVUDBRU223NANA19.3 (failure of endoscopic treatment)(1) No. of comorbidities > 1; (2) Spurting of blood(1) 9.580; (2) 9.971(1) Shock; (2) History of GI bleeding; (3) PLT 100 x 109/L; (4) Active spurting of blood; (5) Large lesion size(1) 3.058; (2) 2.809; (3) 0.067; (4) 10.390; (5) 7.111NA
González-González et al[9]2011NVUDBPU107758.8 ± 18.910.23.4(1) No. of comorbidities/patient; (2) Serum albumin level < 2.6 g/dL; (3) Rebleeding; (4) Rockall score preendoscopy; (5) Lengths of hospital stay(1) 1.6; (2) 4.9; (3) 6.5; (4) 1.3; (5) 1.04NANA1.5
Morales Uribe et al[10]2011UDBPM46459.79.917.4(1) Bleeding site (inhospital vs outpatients); (2) Comorbidities(1) 2.4; (2) 2.5NANA2.2
Nahon et al[11]2012UDBPM329863 ± 188.39.9(1) Rockall score; (2) Comorbidities; (3) SBP < 100 mmHg(1) 2.8; (2) 3.6 (for each additio-nal comorbidity); (3) 2.1(1) Need for transfusions; (2) Hb < 10 g/dL; (3) Rockall score; (4) SBP < 100 mmHg; (5) Signs of recent bleeding(1) 19.1; (2) 1.7; (3) 1.4 (for each point score increase); (4) 1.9; (5) 2.4NA
Del Piano et al[12]2013NVUDBPM1413(1) -66.5 ± 15.8 male; (2) -74.2 ± 14.6 female5.44NANA(1) Female sex; (2) Neoplasia; (3) Multiple comorbidities; (4) Shock at admission; (5) Early rebleeding(1) 2.19; (2) 2.7; (3) 5.04; (4) 4.55; (5) 1.4714.3 (of early rebleeders)
Taha et al[13]2014UDBRU2669NA7.1(1) Age; (2) Charlson score; (3) Rockall score; (4) Units of blood transfused(1) 1.020; (2) 1.291; (3) 1.274; (4) 1.085NANA2.1
Marmo et al[14,15]2014NVUDBPM231767.9 ± 16.74.5735.61(1) Hemodynamic instability on presentation; (2) ASA class 3 or 4; (3) Low-dose aspirin use; (4) History of peptic ulcer; (5) Rebleeding; (6) Failed endoscopic treatment(1) 7.311; 2.312; (2) 6.721; 3.892; (3) 0.121; 0.252; (4) 3.181; 1.542; (5) 5.222; 14.292NANA(1) 1.51; (2) 22
3.42
Lee et al[16]2016NVUDBPU18459.818.7314.73(1) Diabetes mellitus; (2) Metastatic malignancy; (3) Age ≥ 65 yr; (4) Hypotension(1) 12.67; (2) 29.24; (3) 5.06; (4) 16.63NANANA
Hwang et al[17]2016NVUDBPM1584653.437.3(1) Age > 65 yr; (2) Hemodynamic instability; (3) Serum BUN levels > 40 mg/dL; (4) Active bleeding at endoscopy; (5) Transfusions; (6) Comorbidities; (7) Rebleeding(1) 2.627; (2) 2.217; (3) 1.895; (4) 2.434; (5) 3.811; (6) 3.481; (7) 10.581NANA2.8 (surgery/ percutaneous embolisation)