Risk factors, clinical features, and short-term prognosis of spontaneous fungal peritonitis in cirrhosis: A matched case-control study

Table 5 Performance of six prognostic scoring systems in predicting mortality in patients with spontaneous fungal peritonitis / fungiascites

Prognostic model	Auroc (95%CI)	Sensitivity (95%CI)	Specificity (95%CI)	Z score	P-value
SOFA	0.850 (0.707-0.993)	61.5 (31.8-86.1)	90.9 (70.8-98.9)
CLIF-SOFA	0.825 (0.686-0.964)	84.6 (54.6-98.1)	77.3 (54.6-92.2)	0.498	0.619
CTP	0.825 (0.675-0.975)	69.2 (38.6-90.9)	86.4 (65.1-97.1)	0.42	0.674
APPACHE II	0.722 (0.521-0.923)	61.5 (31.6-90.9)	86.4 (65.1-97.1)	1.335	0.182
MELD-Na	0.759 (0.556-0.962)	76.9 (46.2-95.0)	77.3 (54.6-92.2)	0.723	0.469
MELD	0.724 (0.514-0.934)	69.2 (38.6-90.9)	86.4 (65.1-97.1)	1.035	0.301
SIRS	0.680 (0.496-0.864)	76.9 (46.2-95.0)	59.1 (36.4-79.3)	1.429	0.153

SIRS: Systemic inflammatory response; SOFA: Sequential organ failure assessment; CLIF-SOFA: Chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment; APACHE II: Chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease; CTP: Child-Turcotte-Pugh.