Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2019; 7(15): 1964-1977
Published online Aug 6, 2019. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i15.1964
Table 1 Patients’ demographic information
Homo, n = 65Hetero, n = 23P-value
Age in yr69 (42-81)67.0 (45-82)
< 7034 (52%)15 (65%)0.284
≥ 7031 (48%)8 (35%)
Sex
Male43 (66%)18 (78%)0.279
Female22 (34%)5 (22%)
ECOG performance status
061 (94%)20 (87%)0.152
12 (3%)3 (13%)(0 vs ≥ 1)
22 (3%)0
Macroscopic type
17 (11%)1 (5%)0.008
228 (43%)4 (17%)(type 1/2 vs 3/4)
323 (35%)16 (69%)
47 (11%)2 (9%)
Tumor location
Upper27 (42%)11 (48%)0.601
Middle / lower38 (58%)12 (52%)
Histology
Well differentiated48 (74%)14 (61%)0.31
Poorly differentiated15 (23%)9 (39%)
Other/unknown2 (3%)0
T status
cT22 (3%)00.267
cT317 (26%)4 (17%)(cT2/3 vs cT4)
cT446 (71%)19 (83%)
N status
cN05 (8%)2 (9%)0.748
cN15 (8%)1 (4%)(≤cN2 vs cN3)
cN232 (49%)11 (48%)
cN323 (35%)9 (39%)
Number of non-curative factor
01 (1%)1 (4%)0.404
132 (49%)13 (57%)(≤1 vs >1)
229 (45%)9 (39%)
>23 (5%)0
Non-curative factor
Lymph node34 (52%)10 (43%)
Peritoneal22 (34%)6 (26%)
Hepatic27 (42%)12 (52%)
Other9 (14%)1 (5%)
Number of HER2 assessment
235 (54%)10 (43%)0.393
327 (42%)13 (57%)
>33 (4%)0
HER2 score
3+53 (82%)10 (43%)0.001
2+12 (18%)13 (57%)
Upfront chemotherapy
SOXT33 (50%)12 (52%)
XPT25 (37%)7 (30%)
SPT3 (5%)2 (9%)
FPT1 (2%)2 (9%)
FLT1 (2%)
PTXT1 (2%)
DCST1 (2%)