©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 16, 2018; 6(3): 27-34
Published online Mar 16, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27
Published online Mar 16, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27
Table 1 Periapical lesions on teeth treated with polyethylene fibre posts (n = 31), Zirconia-rich glass fibre posts (n = 31), and direct resin composite restorations n (%)
| Time (mo) | 6 | 12 | 24 | 36 | |||||
| Materials | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | Polyethylene | Zirconia | |
| Periapical lesion | A | 31 (100) | 30 (96.8) | 27 (87.1) | 27 (87.1) | 22 (71.0) | 23 (74.2) | 22 (71.0) | 23 (74.2) |
| B | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) | 4 (12.9) | 3 (9.7) | 5 (16.1) | 5 (16.1) | 5 (16.1) | 5 (16.1) | |
| C | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.2) | 4 (12.9) | 3 (9.7) | 4 (12.9) | 3 (9.7) | |
| NS | NS | NS | NS | ||||||
- Citation: Ayna B, Ayna E, Çelenk S, Başaran EG, Yılmaz BD, Tacir İH, Tuncer MC. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of two different types of post systems which were restored with composite restorations. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(3): 27-34
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i3/27.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i3.27