Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2018; 6(13): 611-623
Published online Nov 6, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i13.611
Table 3 Clinical outcomes during follow-up in patients with acute response treated with traditional nonselective beta-blockers and in patients without acute response treated with carvedilol
Variable1Traditional NSBB, n = 52Carvedilol, n = 24P value
Decompensation (global)212 (23.1)8 (33.3)0.405
First decompensation3 (14.3)2 (22.2)0.622
Further decompensation9 (29.0)6 (40.0)0.514
Portal hypertension-related bleeding2 (3.8)3 (12.5)0.318
Ascites
Overall7 (13.5)4 (16.7)0.734
De novo ascites3 (5.8)1 (4.2)1
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis1 (1.9)2 (8.3)0.233
Hepatorenal syndrome1 (1.9)1 (4.2)0.535
Hepatic encephalopathy
Overall7 (13.5)5 (20.8)0.502
De novo hepatic encephalopathy3 (5.8)4 (16.7)0.191
Hepatocellular carcinoma (de novo)3 (6.1)0 (0)0.546
Portal thrombosis5 (9.6)3 (12.5)0.702
Nonselective beta-blocker
Propranolol dose, n/mg per day35 / 107.6
Nadolol dose, n/mg per day17 / 83.5
Carvedilol dose, n/mg per day24 / 9.2
Chronic hemodynamic response
Change from baseline HVPG, %-11.9 ± 21.8-12.2 ± 18.50.965
≥ 10% reduction in HVPG15 (55.6)9 (69.2)0.503
≥ 20% reduction in HVPG8 (29.6)4 (30.8)1
Decrease to < 12 mmHg3 (11.1)4 (30.8)0.187
Lost to follow-up, n/%14 (26.9)3 (12.5)0.238
Betablocker intolerance6 (11.5)1 (4.2)0.421
Change to carvedilol after second hemodynamic study5 (7.7)
Ceased follow-up3 (5.8)2 (8.3)0.648