Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 16, 2016; 4(10): 333-335
Published online Oct 16, 2016. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v4.i10.333
Lesion presenting with a “blue amber” pattern
Calogero Pagliarello, Francesca Peccerillo, Alfredo Zucchi, Rocco Giuseppe Tortorella, Roberto Ricci, Ignazio Stanganelli, Claudio Feliciani, Sergio Di Nuzzo, Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy
Ignazio Stanganelli, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, 47014 Meldola, Forlì-Cesena, Italy
Author contributions: Pagliarello C and Peccerillo F contributed equally to this work; Pagliarello C and Peccerillo F designed the report; Zucchi A and Tortorella RG excised the lesion; Ricci R collected the patient’s clinical data; Stanganelli I, Feliciani C and Di Nuzzo S critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; Pagliarello C and Peccerillo F analysed the data and wrote the paper.
Institutional review board statement: This case report was exempt from the Institutional Review Board standards at the University of Parma, Italy.
Informed consent statement: The patient involved in this case gave her written informed consent authorising use and disclosure of her protected health information.
Conflict-of-interest statement: None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Calogero Pagliarello, MD, Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Parma, via Gramsci 14, 43100 Parma, Italy. calogero.pagliarello@libero.it
Telephone: +39-0521-033562 Fax: +39-0521-702959
Received: February 27, 2016
Peer-review started: February 27, 2016
First decision: March 24, 2016
Revised: August 2, 2016
Accepted: August 17, 2016
Article in press: August 18, 2016
Published online: October 16, 2016

Abstract

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is a spindle cell neoplasm with low metastatic potential but high tendency to recur after surgery. Because of the rarity of this lesion and its aspecific clinical features, AFX could be easily misdiagnosed and undertreated by many clinicians who encounter them. Dermoscopy represents a valuable tool for easily assessing skin lesions, even though histological examination is required for final diagnosis. We report a case of a cheek lesion with dermoscopic “blue amber pattern”, easily recognisable and not observed in others skin tumours, which could represent an additional feature useful in differentiating this tumour from other skin neoplasms.

Key Words: Atypical fibroxanthoma, Dermoscopy, Blue amber pattern, Vascular structures

Core tip: Until recent years there has been little published literature about the dermatoscopy of atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX). A case of AFX is presented. Dermatoscopy could be helpful in avoiding a misdiagnosis and undertreatment of this tumour.



INTRODUCTION

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) is an uncommon, locally aggressive malignant fibrohistiocytic tumour with a tendency for recurrence and a low metastatic potential[1]. Exposure to ultraviolet light represents a risk factor for its development. AFX is usually described as a solitary red or pink papule or extensively ulcerated nodule on the head or neck; nevertheless, early cases could be easily undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. Complete tumour excision could be critical in avoiding local recurrence[1]. Although the rarity of this neoplasm explains its low clinical suspicion, the absence of characteristic features contributes to the delay in diagnosis that it is usually reached through histopathological examination. Dermoscopy has proven to be a useful diagnostic tool in other cutaneous malignancies[2,3], but the unique published report concerning AFX shows that its dermoscopic features are non-contributory and nonspecific[4]. The correct preoperative diagnosis is therefore rarely made. Undertreatment usually will result in recurrence, since the recurrence rate for AFX is high even for cases treated appropriately and in a timely manner.

CASE REPORT

We present the case of a 69-year-old female with a history of hypertension and occupational sun exposure. She was referred to our clinic for evaluation of an asymptomatic, rapidly growing violaceous nodule on her cheek that appeared 8 wk earlier (Figure 1A). The lesion was previously diagnosed twice as a basal cell carcinoma and accordingly treated with imiquimod and cryotherapy, but it recurred. Using dermoscopy, we observed on the right side of the lesion some irregular, linear vessels over a whitish veil. On the left side, however, we noticed a “blue amber” pattern consisting of bluish, homogeneous pigmentation surrounded by a purple halo with scattered yellowish inclusions (Figure 1B and inset). The plaque was excised, and histological examination showed an intradermal tumour with no epidermal involvement, made up of a mixture of spindle-shaped cells, histiocytelike cells, xanthomatous cells, and multinucleated giant cells with marked pleomorphism, hypercromasia, and prominent mitotic activity (Figure 2). A diagnosis of AFX was made.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Clinical image and dermoscopy of atypical fibroxanthoma. A: Asymptomatic skin lesion; B: Dermoscopy of the same lesion the same lesion.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Histological examination of the same lesion (magnification A: × 10, B: × 40).
DISCUSSION

The correct diagnosis of AFX is difficult because of its rarity, so skin biopsy for obtaining histological examination is usually necessary. A handful of cases has been reported in the literature about dermoscopy of AFX. Bugatti et al[4] described these lesions as “slightly pigmented, reddish, malignant cutaneous tumours displaying prominent and chaotic dermatoscopic neoangiogenetic features in more advanced stages of proliferation”. Lallas et al[5] described AFX as “typified by reddish and whitish areas in combination with polymorphous vascular pattern with various combinations of linear, dotted, hairpin and highly tortuous vessel irregularly distributed over the surface of the lesion”. Pitarch et al[6] recognised in AFX “shiny whitish areas between the rainbow-patterned structures and scales visible on surface”. Until recent years there has been little published literature about the dermatoscopy of AFX, and published reports suggest that dermoscopic features are quite non-specific and depend on the stage of the lesion. Therefore, as stated elsewhere, is highly recommended the excision of any skin lesion with the clinical features of elevation, firmness and growth[7] for avoiding AFX undertreatment. Although the vascular morphology of our lesion was suspicious for a malignant neoplasm, such as an adnexal tumour or amelanotic melanoma, the blue amber pattern, to our knowledge, had not been previously reported. The anatomical counterparts of this pattern are possibly represented by haemorrhagic areas in the periphery of the lesion, while xanthomatised cells could explain the yellow inclusions. The blue amber pattern is easily recognisable and is not observed in other skin tumours; it could represent an additional feature in the differential diagnosis between AFX and other skin neoplasms such as basal cell carcinoma, prompting a histological examination. We provide an easy-to-recognise dermoscopic pattern in a histologically proven case of AFX. Dermatologists should be aware of this pattern to avoid undertreating this neoplasm.

COMMENTS
Case characteristics

A 69-year-old female with a history of hypertension and occupational sun exposure with a nontender nodule on her cheek of eight weeks’ duration.

Clinical diagnosis

Rapidly growing violaceous nodule on cheek.

Differential diagnosis

Basal cell carcinoma, merckel cell carcinoma.

Laboratory diagnosis

All labs were within normal limits.

Pathological diagnosis

Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX).

Treatment

Complete surgical excision of lesion.

Related reports

AFX and solid neoplasm presenting as a solitary red or pink papule or extensively ulcerated nodule on the head or neck.

Term explanation

AFX: A locally aggressive malignant fibrohistiocytic tumour with a tendency for recurrence and a low metastatic potential.

Experiences and lessons

This entity is commonly undiagnosed or misdiagnosed. Dermoscopy have the potential for avoiding undertreatment of this tumour.

Peer-review

This is a nice case report illustrating an easily recognizable dermoscopic pattern (“blue amber pattern”) which could represent an additional feature in differential diagnosis between Atypical fibroxanthoma and other skin neoplasms.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Invited manuscript

Specialty Type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country of Origin: Italy

Peer-Review Report Classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): C, C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P- Reviewer: Gonzalez-Lopez MA, Kaliyadan F S- Editor: Ji FF L- Editor: A E- Editor: Wu HL

References
1.  Iorizzo LJ, Brown MD. Atypical fibroxanthoma: a review of the literature. Dermatol Surg. 2011;37:146-157.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 74]  [Article Influence: 5.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Zalaudek I, Kreusch J, Giacomel J, Ferrara G, Catricalà C, Argenziano G. How to diagnose nonpigmented skin tumors: a review of vascular structures seen with dermoscopy: part II. Nonmelanocytic skin tumors. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63:377-386; quiz 387-388.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 168]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 176]  [Article Influence: 12.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Argenziano G, Zalaudek I, Corona R, Sera F, Cicale L, Petrillo G, Ruocco E, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Soyer HP. Vascular structures in skin tumors: a dermoscopy study. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:1485-1489.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 209]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 203]  [Article Influence: 10.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Bugatti L, Filosa G. Dermatoscopic features of cutaneous atypical fibroxanthoma: three cases. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009;34:e898-e900.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Lallas A, Moscarella E, Argenziano G, Longo C, Apalla Z, Ferrara G, Piana S, Rosato S, Zalaudek I. Dermoscopy of uncommon skin tumours. Australas J Dermatol. 2014;55:53-62.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Pitarch G. Patrón dermatoscópico en arcoíris en fibroxantoma atípico. Dermoscopic rainbow pattern in atypical fibroxanthoma. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105:97-99.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Inskip M, Magee J, Weedon D, Rosendahl C. Atypical fibroxanthoma of the cheek-case report with dermatoscopy and dermatopathology. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2014;4:77-80.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]