Implant biomaterials: A comprehensive review

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 3, Issue 1

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

2314

WORD

348

HTML

19514

Tables (1-1)

203

Sum=22379

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

1134

Download

1407

Sum=2541

Jan 16, 2015 (publication date) through Apr 26, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Minireviews

World J Clin Cases. Jan 16, 2015; 3(1): 52-57
Published online Jan 16, 2015. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.52

Table 1 Implant materials can be classified based on the type of material used and the biologic response they elicit when implanted[3]

Biodynamic activity	Chemical composition
Biodynamic activity	Metals	Ceramics	Polymers
Biotolerant	Gold Co-Cr alloys Stainless steel Niobium Tantalum		Polyethylene Polyamide Polymethylmethacrylate Polytetrafluroethylene Polyurethane
Bio inert	Commercially pure titanium Titanium alloy (Ti-6AL-4U)	Al oxide Zirconium oxide
Bioactive		Hydroxyapatite Tricalcium phosphate Bio glass Carbon-silicon

Citation: Saini M, Singh Y, Arora P, Arora V, Jain K. Implant biomaterials: A comprehensive review. World J Clin Cases 2015; 3(1): 52-57
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v3/i1/52.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.52