Interspinous posterior devices: What is the real surgical indication?

doi:10.12998/wjcc.v2.i9.402

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 2, Issue 9

This Article

(285)

(319)

(0)

(7016)

(22)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

- Full Article with Cover (PDF)
- Full Article (XML)

Editorial

World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2014; 2(9): 402-408
Published online Sep 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i9.402

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Dislocation of the L3-L4 interspinous posterior device in a patient with double level implant. The patient underwent revision surgery with removal of both interspinous posterior devices followed by decompression and stabilization with screws and rods.

Citation: Landi A. Interspinous posterior devices: What is the real surgical indication? World J Clin Cases 2014; 2(9): 402-408
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v2/i9/402.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v2.i9.402

Landi A. Interspinous posterior devices: What is the real surgical indication? World J Clin Cases 2014; 2(9): 402-408 [PMID: 25232541 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i9.402]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.