©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 16, 2014; 2(12): 742-756
Published online Dec 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i12.742
Published online Dec 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i12.742
Table 1 Comparisons of conventional categories of nebulizers
| Jet | Ultrasonic | Vibrating mesh | |
| Features | |||
| Power source | Compressed gas or electrical mains | Electrical mains | Batteries or electrical mains |
| Portability | Restricted | Restricted | Portable |
| Treatment time | Long | Intermediate | Short |
| Output rate | Low | Higher | Highest |
| Residual volume | 0.8-2.0 mL | Variable but low | < 0.2 mL |
| Environmental contamination | |||
| Continuous use | High | High | High |
| Breath-activated | Low | Low | Low |
| Performance variability | High | Intermediate | Low |
| Formulation characteristics | |||
| Temperature | Decreases | Increases | Minimum change |
| Concentration | Increases | Variables | Minimum change |
| Suspensions | Low efficiency | Poor efficiency | Variable efficiency |
| Denaturation | Possible | Probable | Possible |
| Cleaning | Required, after single use | Required, after multiple use | Required, after single use |
| Cost | Very low | High | High |
- Citation: Kleinstreuer C, Feng Y, Childress E. Drug-targeting methodologies with applications: A review. World J Clin Cases 2014; 2(12): 742-756
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v2/i12/742.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v2.i12.742