©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 6, 2026; 14(7): 118719
Published online Mar 6, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v14.i7.118719
Published online Mar 6, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v14.i7.118719
Table 2 Quality assessment of observational studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale
| Ref. | Study design | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Total |
| Smith et al[16], 2014 | Sequential prospective cohort | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 |
| Okumura et al[17], 2022 | Prospective cohort | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
| Cheu et al[18], 1988 | Retrospective cohort | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| Ji et al[7], 2025 | Not applicable (non-comparative/mechanistic) | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Hopkins et al[19], 2011 | Case report (2 cases) | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
- Citation: Ribeiro Junior MAF, Dib Possiedi R, Stefani Pacheco L, de Cesaro Schpchacki N, Nafeesa Hashim S, Monteiro Tavares Pereira B. Direct peritoneal resuscitation in sepsis and intra-abdominal infection: A scoping review. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(7): 118719
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v14/i7/118719.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v14.i7.118719