BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2026; 14(28): 126107
Published online Oct 6, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.126107
Table 1 Summary of literature for Barrett’s Esophagus
Disease
Ref.
AI architecture
Training/validation cohort
Targeted Endpoint
Key AI performance metrics
Performance compared to humans
BE[8]CNN-based CADeBenchmarking image test set: 400 images; Benchmarking video test set: 188 videosDetection of Barrett’s neoplasiaImages: Sensitivity 90%, Specificity 80%; videos: Sensitivity 91%, Specificity 82%CADe system compared to general endoscopists — Images: Sensitivity 90% vs 74% videos: Sensitivity 91% vs 67%
[9]CNN-based CADeTraining: 75198 neoplastic images/videos (96 patients) and 1014973 non-neoplastic images/videos (65 patients); image validation: 471 images (34 patients); video validation: 75 videos (75 patients)Detection of Barrett’s neoplasiaSensitivity 93.8%, Specificity 90.7%, accuracy 92.0%Non-expert endoscopists: Sensitivity 63.5%, specificity 77.9%, Accuracy 71.8% (P < 0.05 for all)
[10]CNN-based CADePretraining: 494364 labeled endoscopic images; fine-tuning: 1704 esophageal high-resolution images (669 patients); benchmarking test set: 80 images (80 patients)Detection of early neoplasia in BESensitivity 93%, specificity 83%, accuracy 88%53 general endoscopists: Sensitivity 72%, specificity 74%, accuracy 73%, all substantially inferior to the CADe system scores
[11]NLPDevelopment: 600 pathology reports (457 confirmed BE, 60 with dysplasia); validation: 400 reports (230 confirmed BE, 39 with dysplasia)Identification of dysplasia in BEAccuracy 98.7%, recall 92.3%, precision 100%N/A
[12]NLPDevelopment/validation: 426 pathology notes (426 patients); full cohort application: 121808 individualsIdentification of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasiaOverall accuracy 97.6%-100%; BE: Sensitivity 98.9%, specificity 99.6%; gastric IM: Sensitivity 86.8%, specificity 99.0%N/A
[13]CNN ensemble on digitized histology542 patients (164 NDBE, 226 LGD, 152 HGD); 8596 training bounding boxes, 1946 validation, 840 testClassification of BE dysplasia gradeLow grade dysplasia: Sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 100%; non-dysplastic BE and high grade dysplasia: Sensitivity and specificity > 90%N/A
[14]Deep learning (CNN-based image and video analysis)1970 pCLE videos; 897931 biopsy patches; 387 whole-slide imagesClassification of BE dysplasia on pCLEpCLE: Sensitivity for dysplasia 71%, overall accuracy 90%N/A
[16]CNN (pretrained on ImageNet, fine-tuned) with object detection algorithm916 dysplastic images (65 patients) and 919 non-dysplastic control images; 458 test images (225 dysplasia, 233 non-dysplasia)Detection of early neoplasia in BESensitivity 96.4%, specificity 94.2%, accuracy 95.4%N/A
[17]CNN (indirectly supervised classifier + directly supervised segmentation/localization model)Training: 148936 video frames (64 patients); Validation: 25161 images (11 patients); test: 264 i-scan images (44 patients); localization model: Trained on 94 delineated images (30 patients), tested on 86 images (28 patients)Detection and localization of BE dysplasiaAUC 93%, Sensitivity 91%, specificity 79%; on endoscopist comparison subset: Sensitivity 96%, specificity 88%6 non-expert endoscopists (same image subset): Sensitivity 79%, specificity 49%
[18]CNN (EfficientNetV2B2, pretrained, NBI endoscopic images)724 cases total; test set: 160 NBI images from 86 patients with histological confirmationDetection of BE on NBISensitivity 94.3%; specificity 94.4%, accuracy 94.37%N/A
[19]Vision Transformer (ViTBase16, pretrained)1918 images from 267 patients (classified as dysplastic or non-dysplastic BE)Classification of BE dysplasiaSensitivity 97%, specificity 99%, accuracy 99%N/A


Write to the Help Desk