Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2026; 14(28): 126107
Published online Oct 6, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.126107
Published online Oct 6, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.126107
Table 1 Summary of literature for Barrett’s Esophagus
| Disease | Ref. | AI architecture | Training/validation cohort | Targeted Endpoint | Key AI performance metrics | Performance compared to humans |
| BE | [8] | CNN-based CADe | Benchmarking image test set: 400 images; Benchmarking video test set: 188 videos | Detection of Barrett’s neoplasia | Images: Sensitivity 90%, Specificity 80%; videos: Sensitivity 91%, Specificity 82% | CADe system compared to general endoscopists — Images: Sensitivity 90% vs 74% videos: Sensitivity 91% vs 67% |
| [9] | CNN-based CADe | Training: 75198 neoplastic images/videos (96 patients) and 1014973 non-neoplastic images/videos (65 patients); image validation: 471 images (34 patients); video validation: 75 videos (75 patients) | Detection of Barrett’s neoplasia | Sensitivity 93.8%, Specificity 90.7%, accuracy 92.0% | Non-expert endoscopists: Sensitivity 63.5%, specificity 77.9%, Accuracy 71.8% (P < 0.05 for all) | |
| [10] | CNN-based CADe | Pretraining: 494364 labeled endoscopic images; fine-tuning: 1704 esophageal high-resolution images (669 patients); benchmarking test set: 80 images (80 patients) | Detection of early neoplasia in BE | Sensitivity 93%, specificity 83%, accuracy 88% | 53 general endoscopists: Sensitivity 72%, specificity 74%, accuracy 73%, all substantially inferior to the CADe system scores | |
| [11] | NLP | Development: 600 pathology reports (457 confirmed BE, 60 with dysplasia); validation: 400 reports (230 confirmed BE, 39 with dysplasia) | Identification of dysplasia in BE | Accuracy 98.7%, recall 92.3%, precision 100% | N/A | |
| [12] | NLP | Development/validation: 426 pathology notes (426 patients); full cohort application: 121808 individuals | Identification of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia | Overall accuracy 97.6%-100%; BE: Sensitivity 98.9%, specificity 99.6%; gastric IM: Sensitivity 86.8%, specificity 99.0% | N/A | |
| [13] | CNN ensemble on digitized histology | 542 patients (164 NDBE, 226 LGD, 152 HGD); 8596 training bounding boxes, 1946 validation, 840 test | Classification of BE dysplasia grade | Low grade dysplasia: Sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 100%; non-dysplastic BE and high grade dysplasia: Sensitivity and specificity > 90% | N/A | |
| [14] | Deep learning (CNN-based image and video analysis) | 1970 pCLE videos; 897931 biopsy patches; 387 whole-slide images | Classification of BE dysplasia on pCLE | pCLE: Sensitivity for dysplasia 71%, overall accuracy 90% | N/A | |
| [16] | CNN (pretrained on ImageNet, fine-tuned) with object detection algorithm | 916 dysplastic images (65 patients) and 919 non-dysplastic control images; 458 test images (225 dysplasia, 233 non-dysplasia) | Detection of early neoplasia in BE | Sensitivity 96.4%, specificity 94.2%, accuracy 95.4% | N/A | |
| [17] | CNN (indirectly supervised classifier + directly supervised segmentation/localization model) | Training: 148936 video frames (64 patients); Validation: 25161 images (11 patients); test: 264 i-scan images (44 patients); localization model: Trained on 94 delineated images (30 patients), tested on 86 images (28 patients) | Detection and localization of BE dysplasia | AUC 93%, Sensitivity 91%, specificity 79%; on endoscopist comparison subset: Sensitivity 96%, specificity 88% | 6 non-expert endoscopists (same image subset): Sensitivity 79%, specificity 49% | |
| [18] | CNN (EfficientNetV2B2, pretrained, NBI endoscopic images) | 724 cases total; test set: 160 NBI images from 86 patients with histological confirmation | Detection of BE on NBI | Sensitivity 94.3%; specificity 94.4%, accuracy 94.37% | N/A | |
| [19] | Vision Transformer (ViTBase16, pretrained) | 1918 images from 267 patients (classified as dysplastic or non-dysplastic BE) | Classification of BE dysplasia | Sensitivity 97%, specificity 99%, accuracy 99% | N/A |
- Citation: Lahoud C, Reddy S, Tam R, Qaqish F, Dhakal R, Hasham A. Updates on the clinical use of artificial intelligence in upper gastrointestinal diseases: A comprehensive literature review. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(28): 126107
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v14/i28/126107.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.126107