BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2026; 14(24): 122847
Published online Aug 26, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.122847
Table 2 Simplified GRADE-informed certainty of evidence for main outcomes
Outcome
Population/setting
Certainty
Main reasons for rating
Bleeding cessationStable non-massive adult haemoptysis, nebulised TXALowTwo consistent randomised trials; downgraded for imprecision (small samples)
MortalityICU/mixed-acuity adult haemoptysisVery lowDirectly conflicting observational signals; serious risk of bias from confounding by indication; downgraded for inconsistency and risk of bias
RecurrenceStable non-massive adult and CF haemoptysisLowSparse data from one trial and one uncontrolled pathway study; downgraded for imprecision and indirectness
Need for invasive proceduresStable non-massive adult haemoptysis, nebulised TXALowConsistent direction across two randomised trials and observational data; downgraded for imprecision
Length of stayStable non-massive adult haemoptysis, nebulised TXALowConsistent direction across trial and observational data; downgraded for imprecision and indirectness across settings
Adverse events (thromboembolism, bronchospasm)All settingsVery lowMost studies not designed or powered to detect these events; inconsistent or absent reporting; serious risk of bias and imprecision
Bleeding cessation, safety, and feasibilityICU, paediatric, and ECMO populationsVery lowSmall, retrospective, uncontrolled studies with serious risk of bias and indirectness; downgraded on all major domains


Write to the Help Desk