Comparison of electrogastrography findings in patients with dyspepsia with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus

doi:10.12998/wjcc.122765

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 14, Issue 22

This Article

(22)

(23)

(0)

(10)

(223)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.

World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2026; 14(22): 122765
Published online Aug 6, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.122765

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants and bivariate analysis of study cohorts, n (%)/mean ± SD

Characteristics	Overall	T2DM, n = 38	Non-T2DM, n = 38	P value
Age (year)	49.855 ± 15.851	56.736 ± 14.128	42.973 ± 14.574	< 0.001
18-49	37 (48.7)	10 (26.3)	27 (71.0)	0.001
≥ 50	39 (51.3)	28 (73.7)	11 (29.0)	0.001
Sex				0.814
Male	30 (39.5)	16 (42.1)	14 (36.8)
Female	46 (60.5)	22 (57.9)	24 (63.2)
BMI Asia-Pacific category				0.006
Underweight	5 (6.6)	3 (7.9)	2 (5.3)
Normal	11 (14.5)	2 (5.3)	9 (23.7)
Overweight	15 (19.7)	3 (7.9)	12 (31.5)
Obesity I	29 (38.2)	18 (47.4)	11 (29.0)
Obesity II	16 (21.1)	12 (31.5)	4 (10.5)
HbA1c (%)	6.95 (2.2)	6.95 (2.2)
SF-LDQ score	16.408 ± 6.907	15.157 ± 6.680	17.657 ± 6.991	0.115
Dyspepsia severity				0.097
Mild	13 (17.1)	8 (21.1)	5 (13.2)
Moderate	23 (30.3)	14 (36.8)	9 (23.7)
Severe	40 (52.7)	16 (42.1)	24 (63.2)
Dominant symptom				0.105
None	1 (1.3)	0 (0)	1 (2.6)
Heartburn	13 (17.1)	4 (10.5)	9 (23.7)
Indigestion	34 (44.7)	22 (57.9)	12 (31.5)
Regurgitation	12 (15.8)	4 (10.5)	8 (21.1)
Nausea	16 (21.1)	8 (21.1)	8 (21.1)
EGG result				0.005
Bradygastria	47 (61.8)	30 (78.9)	17 (44.7)
Normogastria	18 (23.7)	5 (13.2)	13 (34.2)
Tachygastria	11 (14.5)	3 (7.9)	8 (21.1)

BMI: Body mass index; EGG: Electrogastrography; HbA1c: Haemoglobin A1c; SF-LDQ: Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire; T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Full Size Table

Citation: Prawira T, Fauzi A, Makmun D, Rumende CM, Yunihastuti E, Maulahela H, Roosheroe AG, Susilo A, Halim PP. Comparison of electrogastrography findings in patients with dyspepsia with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(22): 122765
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v14/i22/122765.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.122765

Prawira T, Fauzi A, Makmun D, Rumende CM, Yunihastuti E, Maulahela H, Roosheroe AG, Susilo A, Halim PP. Comparison of electrogastrography findings in patients with dyspepsia with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(22): 122765 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.122765]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.