BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2026; 14(20): 121727
Published online Jul 16, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.121727
Table 2 Comparison of endovascular techniques
Feature
Microsurgical resection
Early embolic agents (n-BCA)
Modern embolic agents (Onyx, PHIL)
RoleGold standard for select patientsAdjunct to surgery; can be definitive in select casesAdjunct or definitive therapy in select cases
InvasivenessOpen surgeryMinimally invasiveMinimally invasive
MechanismDirect removal of AVM nidusRapid polymerization upon contact with bloodSlow solidification allowing controlled injection and deeper penetration
EffectivenessHigh obliteration rates (> 98%)Used to reduce nidus size and delineate feedersHigher occlusion rates and reduced need for surgery
Injection controlDifficult due to rapid polymerizationImproved control with prolonged injection
Safety concernsLimited in deep/complex AVMs; hemorrhagic riskCatheter entrapment, vessel occlusionImproved control; safer delivery profile
Technological featuresAdhesive embolic agentNon-adhesive agents with deeper nidus penetration
Microcatheter considerationsRisk of entrapment with early systemsDetachable-tip microcatheters improve safety
LimitationsLimited in deep-seated or complex AVMsPoor injection control and higher complication riskRisk of premature tip detachment


Write to the Help Desk