Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2026; 14(20): 121727
Published online Jul 16, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.121727
Published online Jul 16, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.121727
Table 2 Comparison of endovascular techniques
| Feature | Microsurgical resection | Early embolic agents (n-BCA) | Modern embolic agents (Onyx, PHIL) |
| Role | Gold standard for select patients | Adjunct to surgery; can be definitive in select cases | Adjunct or definitive therapy in select cases |
| Invasiveness | Open surgery | Minimally invasive | Minimally invasive |
| Mechanism | Direct removal of AVM nidus | Rapid polymerization upon contact with blood | Slow solidification allowing controlled injection and deeper penetration |
| Effectiveness | High obliteration rates (> 98%) | Used to reduce nidus size and delineate feeders | Higher occlusion rates and reduced need for surgery |
| Injection control | Difficult due to rapid polymerization | Improved control with prolonged injection | |
| Safety concerns | Limited in deep/complex AVMs; hemorrhagic risk | Catheter entrapment, vessel occlusion | Improved control; safer delivery profile |
| Technological features | Adhesive embolic agent | Non-adhesive agents with deeper nidus penetration | |
| Microcatheter considerations | Risk of entrapment with early systems | Detachable-tip microcatheters improve safety | |
| Limitations | Limited in deep-seated or complex AVMs | Poor injection control and higher complication risk | Risk of premature tip detachment |
- Citation: Romeo J, Surani S, Parsi S, Ratnani I, Kashyap R. Twenty-first century innovations in neuroradiology treatments. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(20): 121727
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v14/i20/121727.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.121727