BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2026; 14(18): 120219
Published online Jun 26, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.120219
Table 3 Major clinical trials and registries evaluating catheter-based therapies for acute pulmonary embolism
Trial
Therapy/device
Study design
Population
Main findings
ULTIMAUATh (EkoSonic)RCTIntermediate-risk PESignificant improvement in RV/LV ratio at 24 hours compared with anticoagulation alone, without increased major bleeding
SEATTLE IIUAThProspective single-arm studyMassive and submassive PEImproved RV function and pulmonary pressures, but higher thrombolytic dose associated with increased bleeding
OPTALYSE PEUAThRandomized dose-optimization trialIntermediate-risk PELower-dose and shorter-duration thrombolysis improved RV function with favorable bleeding profile
SUNSET-sPEUATh vs standard CDTRCTIntermediate-risk PESimilar thrombus reduction between techniques with low major bleeding rates
CANARYCDT vs anticoagulationRCTIntermediate–high-risk PETrial terminated early; interim data supported safety and feasibility of CDT
HI-PEITHOUATh (EkoSonic) + anticoagulation vs anticoagulation aloneRCTIntermediate-risk PE with RV dysfunction and cardiorespiratory distressUATh significantly reduced the composite endpoint of PE-related death, hemodynamic decompensation/collapse or recurrent PE at 7 days (4.0% vs 10.3%) without increased major bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage
KNOCOUT PEUAThProspective registryIntermediate-high and high-risk PELow rates of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage with improved RV function
FLAREFlowTriever thrombectomyProspective multicenter trialIntermediate-risk PESignificant reduction in RV/LV ratio with low major bleeding and minimal ICU utilization
FLASHFlowTriever thrombectomyProspective registryReal-world PE populationConfirmed safety and effectiveness with low adverse event rates
FLAMEFlowTriever vs contemporary therapiesProspective comparative studyHigh-risk PELower in-hospital adverse outcomes and mortality with thrombectomy
EXTRACT-PEIndigo aspiration systemProspective multicenter trialIntermediate-risk PESignificant reduction in RV strain with low major bleeding rates
PEERLESSFlowTriever vs CDTRCTIntermediate-risk PEMechanical thrombectomy reduced clinical deterioration and ICU utilization without increasing bleeding
STORM-PEMechanical thrombectomy + anticoagulation vs anticoagulationRCTIntermediate–high-risk PEGreater improvement in RV/LV ratio and thrombus burden without excess major adverse events


Write to the Help Desk