BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Case Report
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2026; 14(15): 120061
Published online May 26, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v14.i15.120061
Table 2 Comparison of our case to other reports in the literature with regard to orthopaedic sequelae described and follow-up emphasis
Ref.
Main focus
Orthopaedic sequelae described
Follow-up emphasis
Why our case adds value
Kumar et al[14], 2014Nerve-territory undergrowth in sciatic/lumbosacral NMCYes: Limb shortening and hip dysplasiaMechanistic association and phenotype descriptionOur case extends this by detailing longitudinal surveillance, orthopaedic decision-making and timing of guided growth intervention
Park[9], 2019Long-term natural history of sciatic NMCOrthopaedic issues not the primary focusNeurological and radiological stability over long follow-upOur case complements this by showing that prolonged lesion stability may coexist with progressive orthopaedic burden requiring treatment
Present caseLongitudinal paediatric multidisciplinary managementYes: Limb length discrepancy, pelvic obliquity, scoliosis, achilles contracture, calcaneal deformityOrthopaedic surveillance and post-biopsy conservative nerve managementDistinguishing contribution is the detailed orthopaedic pathway from observation to guided growth planning and intervention near skeletal maturity


Write to the Help Desk