Near-infrared fluorescence with indocyanine green for minimally invasive hernia surgery: A systematic review and evidence synthesis

doi:10.12998/wjcc.v14.i14.118964

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 14, Issue 14

This Article

(34)

(53)

(0)

(15)

(1)

(768)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Systematic Reviews

Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.

World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2026; 14(14): 118964
Published online May 16, 2026. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v14.i14.118964

Table 3 Quality assessment of case series and original articles¹

Ref.	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Q5	Q6	Q7	Q8	Q9	Total score	Quality rating
Colavita et al[24], 2016	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	Y	9	High
Zhang et al[9], 2024	Y	Y	U	N	Y	Y	U	Y	Y	6	Fair
Ahmed et al[20], 2022	Y	Y	N	N	Y	Y	U	N	Y	5	Fair
Aarsh et al[13], 2024	Y	N	N	N	Y	U	N	N	N	2	Low

¹Q1: Was the study question or objective clearly stated? Q2: Was the study population clearly and fully described, including a case definition? Q3: Were the cases consecutive? Q4: Were the subjects comparable? Q5: Was the intervention clearly described? Q6: Were the outcome measures clearly defined, valid, reliable, and implemented consistently across all study participants? Q7: Was the length of follow-up adequate? Q8: Were the statistical methods well-described? Q9: Were the results well-described? Y: Yes; N: No; U: Unclear.

Full Size Table

Citation: Pavlidis L, Geropoulos G, Kechagias KS, Psarras K, Patel V, Reza L, Prakash N, Athanasiou C, Geropoulos V, Anestiadou E, Triantafyllou T, Sapalidis K, Laskou S, Dimitroulis D. Near-infrared fluorescence with indocyanine green for minimally invasive hernia surgery: A systematic review and evidence synthesis. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(14): 118964
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v14/i14/118964.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v14.i14.118964

Pavlidis L, Geropoulos G, Kechagias KS, Psarras K, Patel V, Reza L, Prakash N, Athanasiou C, Geropoulos V, Anestiadou E, Triantafyllou T, Sapalidis K, Laskou S, Dimitroulis D. Near-infrared fluorescence with indocyanine green for minimally invasive hernia surgery: A systematic review and evidence synthesis. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(14): 118964 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v14.i14.118964]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.