BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2025; 13(31): 109019
Published online Nov 6, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i31.109019
Table 2 Comparative analysis of the efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloons angioplasty and conventional balloon angioplasty in the hemodialysis pathway
Clinical trials identifier/Ref.
Study design
Types of pathological coronary vessels
Sample size (PCBs vs POBA)
Follow-up duration
Primary end point
Efficacy outcomes
Major adverse events rate (%)
Irani et al[12], 2018Prospective Randomized Single-center Clinical TrialAVF and AVG stenosis63 vs 6212 monthsPrimary patency restenosis rates a (6 months) (%); 34 vs 62.9; P = 0.01Circuit primary patency (6 months) (%); 76 vs 56; P = 0.048; target lesion primary patency (6 months) (%); 51 vs 34; P = 0.04Not mentioned
Liao et al[46], 2020Single-center Prospective Randomized Controlled TrialVenous anastomotic stenosis in dysfunctional AV grafts22 vs 2212 monthsTarget lesion primary patency (6 months) (%); 41 vs 9; P = 0.006Circuit primary patency (6 months) (%); 36 vs 9; P = 0.013; target lesion primary patency (6 months) (%); 23 vs 9; P = 0.019Have no statistical differences
Therasse et al[47], 2021Prospective, Single-blinded, Randomized Multi-Center Clinical TrialDysfunctional arteriovenous fistulae60 vs 6012 monthsLLL after 6 months (mm) (non-adjusted) (mm); 0.64 ± 1.20 vs 1.13 ± 1.51; P = 0.082Restenosis rate (6 months) (%); 56.5 vs 81.1%; P = 0.00853.3 vs 75.0; P = 0.013
Yin et al[48], 2021Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Blinded-endpoint, Controlled TrialConsecutive adult patients with fistula dysfunction78 vs 8312 monthsTarget lesion primary patency (6 months) (%); 65 vs 37; P < 0.001Target lesion (12 months) (%); 73 vs 58 P = 0.04; target shunt (12 months) (%) 73 vs 57; P = 0.0441.1 vs 39.1; P = 0.957
Hsieh et al[45], 2023Prospective, Single-Blinded, Randomised Controlled StudyStent-graft stenosis in haemodialysis vascular access20 vs 206 monthsLLL after 6 months (mm); 1.82 ± 1.83 vs 3.63 ± 1.08; P = 0.001Primary patency restenosis rates (6 months) (%); 80 vs 42; P = 0.005; circuit primary patency (6 months) (%); 35 vs 15; P = 0.086Not mentioned
Zhao et al[49], 2024Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled StudyDysfunctional arteriovenous fistulae122 vs 12212 monthsPrimary patency (6 months) (%); 91 vs 67; P < 0.001Primary patency restenosis rates (12 months) (%); 66 vs 46; P = 0.0040 vs 2.5; P = 0.3


Write to the Help Desk