Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2025; 13(27): 104916
Published online Sep 26, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i27.104916
Published online Sep 26, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i27.104916
Table 3 Quality assessment of the included studies
Ref. | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns | |||||
Patient selection | Index test | Reference standard | Flow and timing | Patient selection | Index test | Reference standard | |
Lee et al[26] | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk |
Zhang et al[24] | High risk | Unclear risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Unclear risk | Low risk |
Zhang et al[27] | High risk | Unclear risk | Low risk | Low risk | High risk | Unclear risk | Low risk |
Rosignolo et al[23] | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk |
Jiang et al[25] | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk |
Yu et al[22] | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Unclear risk | Low risk |
- Citation: Dean B, Geropoulos G, Richardson-Jones T, Fornasiero M, Papapanou M, Konstantinidis C, Madouros N, Spinos D, Koimtzis G, Giannis D, Athanasiou C, Psarras K. Diagnostic accuracy of circulating miR-146, miR-221 and miR-222 in papillary thyroid cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(27): 104916
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v13/i27/104916.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v13.i27.104916